Ng v Miki.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 24267 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I WING C. NG, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. CRAIG MIKI and THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Defendants-Appellees and JOHN DOES 1-20, MARY DOES 1-10, and GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-20, Defendants APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 00-1-3570) SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Levinson, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.; and Moon, C.J., and Nakayama, J., Dissenting) In accordance with Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 35, and after carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and duly considering and analyzing the law relevant to the arguments and issues raised by the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the first circuit court1 filed on April 19, 2001, from which the appeal is taken, is (1) affirmed as to Counts I and II of the complaint, (2) affirmed in part as to Count III and vacated and remanded with respect to Plaintiff-Appellant s claim that he was illegally detained at the time of the subject traffic incident, and (3) affirmed in part as to Count IV of the complaint, and vacated 1 The Honorable Dan Kochi presided over this matter. and remanded with respect to the claim of perjury as to Defendant-Appellee Craig Miki. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 28, 2002. On the briefs: Wing C. Ng, plaintiffappellant, pro se. Greg H. Takase, Deputy Corporation Counsel, City & County of Honolulu, for defendants-appellees. I dissent with respect to vacating the claim of perjury as to Miki. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
