Jackson v. Georgia
Annotate this CaseAppellant Rodney Jackson was tried by jury and convicted of murder and two related firearms charges. He appealed, asserting that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. He also contended the trial court erred when it admitted a partial recording of a phone call that he made and when it allowed the lead investigator to testify about what another law enforcement officer told him. Upon review of the record and briefs, the Georgia Supreme Court found no error, and affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.