D.J. V. STATE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2011 Opinion filed August 24, 2011. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D10-934 Lower Tribunal No. 09-5868 ________________ D.J., a juvenile, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mindy S. Glazer, Judge. Joseph P. George, Jr., Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Third Region, and Dan Hallenberg, Assistant Counsel, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Keri T. Joseph, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before WELLS, C.J., and SALTER and EMAS, JJ. WELLS, Chief Judge. D.J. appeals from an adjudication of delinquency claiming that the court below erred in admitting his school attendance record into evidence. While we agree that the court below erred in admitting this evidence without proper authentication, see ยง 90.901, Fla. Stat. (2010) ( Authentication or identification of evidence is required as a condition precedent to its admissibility. The requirements of this section are satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. ); A. Z. v. State, 383 So. 2d 934, 935 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (reversing dependency determination where, among other errors, [t]he court used the materials [including school records] in formulating its decision . . .[that] were not identified, [nor] authenticated ), we affirm because a review of the record confirms the error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129, 1135 (Fla. 1986) ( The harmless error test . . . places the burden on the state, as the beneficiary of the error, to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict or, alternatively stated, that there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction. ). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
