AMAYA V. STATE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2011 Opinion filed December 7, 2011. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D10-573 Lower Tribunal No. 05-035964 ________________ Armando Amaya, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice A Butchko, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Pubic Defender, and Michael T. Davis, Assistant Pubic Defender, for appellant. Pamelo Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Keri T. Joseph, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before RAMIREZ, SUAREZ, AND CORTIÃ AS, JJ. PER CURIAM. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the defendant s probation, as the record contains sufficient evidence from which the trial court could have found any of the alleged violations of probation occurred, under the preponderance of the evidence standard. Further, the trial court did not prejudice the defendant s due process rights in its conduct of the hearing. See Shores v. State, 765 So. 2d 166, 167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); McPherson v. State, 530 So. 2d 1095, 1099 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Wilson v. State, 506 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Affirmed. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
