PASSMORE V. STATE

Share |
Download as PDF
Loading PDF...
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2005 DARREN JEROME PASSMORE, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. Opinion filed February 2, 2005. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b) (2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Israel Reyes, Judge. Darren Jerome Passmore, in proper person. Charles J. Crist, Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE, GREEN, and WELLS, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to ** ** ** ** CASE NO. 3D05-68 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 95-14556 habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).