State Of Florida v. Randy Dewayne Gibson
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC07-2158 ____________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. RANDY DEWAYNE GIBSON, Respondent. [July 3, 2008] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction of this case, Gibson v. State, 968 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), on the basis of certified direct conflict with State v. Coleman, 911 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), and State v. Laveroni, 910 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss review. It is so ordered. QUINCE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and BELL, JJ., concur. CANTERO, J., did not participate. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions Second District - Case No. 2D06-2106 (Sarasota County) Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Robert J. Krauss, Assistant Attorney General, Bureau Chief, and Susan M. Shanahan, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Petitioner James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Carol J.Y. Wilson, Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, Florida, for Respondent Arthur T. Daus, III, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on behalf of Police K-9 Magazine and Canine Development Group, as Amicus Curiae -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
