Odom v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DUSTIN D. ODOM, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2D11-2075 Opinion filed May 18, 2012. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Denise Pomponio, Judge. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Danilo Cruz-Carino, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. DAVIS, Judge. Dustin D. Odom challenges the thirty-six-month prison term imposed following a revocation of his community control for the original offense of possession of a controlled substance. The only issue raised by Odom's counsel and answered by the State is related to the possession issue discussed in State v. Adkins, 71 So. 3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 71 So. 3d 117 (Fla. 2011). But Odom's revocation was based on a technical violation and does not involve any possession-related new law violations. Because the Adkins issue relates only to his underlying conviction and not to the revocation and sentence currently before this court, we affirm Odom's revocation and resulting sentence without further comment. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT and BLACK, JJ., Concur. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.