Bonilla v. State

Share |
Download as PDF
Loading PDF...
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JUNIOR BONILLA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2D04-3875 Opinion filed November 19, 2004. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Daniel Lee Perry, Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Gipson v. State, 616 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 1993); McCall v. State, 862 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Collins v. State, 800 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); State v. Kinney, 670 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Martin v. State, 795 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). As this court did in McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D1716 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003), supplemented on rehearing, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D215 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 14, 2004). Affirmed; conflict certified. WHATLEY, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur. 2