Bak v. Bak

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2007 ITZHAK BAK, Appellant, v. JOYCE BAK, Appellee. No. 4D06-1348 [January 10, 2007] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. The former husband appeals from an order of contempt. He has failed to present a transcript of proceedings, and thus the appropriateness of the sanctions in the order cannot be addressed, nor can the issue raised with respect to the admissibility of evidence. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). With respect to his claim that the order requires immediate incarceration upon future non-compliance, the order of contempt contains no such mandatory language. All the trial judge did was express a hope that a successor judge would incarcerate the appellant in the event that he were subsequently found to have violated the terms of the final judgment. WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., CONCUR. * * * Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ronald J. Rothschild and Jack Tuter, Judges; L.T. Case No. 99-16808 4290. Itzhak Bak, Dania Beach, pro se. No brief filed on behalf of appellee. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.