Bevan J. Wade vs Jonathan Paul Wade

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA BEVAN J. WADE, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D17-0341 JONATHAN PAUL WADE, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed September 20, 2017. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. David Rimmer, Judge. Bevan J. Wade, pro se, Appellant. Jonathan Paul Wade, pro se, Appellee. PER CURIAM. In this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution, we affirm without comment as to all issues except the requirement that the former husband maintain life insurance to secure his support obligations. The trial court orally pronounced this requirement, but it was not included in the written judgment as the law requires. See Schmidt v. Schmidt, 151 So. 3d 27, 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (holding written judgment must conform to oral pronouncement). Therefore, we reverse and remand for the trial court to modify the final judgment to include the orallypronounced life insurance requirement. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions. RAY, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.