HARRY JAMES PARAMORE, v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA HARRY JAMES PARAMORE, Petitioner, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED. CASE NO. 1D11-0447 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _______________________________/ Opinion filed May 4, 2011. Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction. William Mallory Kent of the Law Office of William Mallory Kent, Jacksonville, for Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. We are satisfied in light of the recent order directing the state to respond to the petitioner s motion for postconviction relief that the circuit court is taking appropriate measures to dispose of that motion. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Florida Parole Comm=n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Nonetheless, as we did in Munn, we encourage the circuit court to expeditiously rule on the motion pending before it. DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., CONCUR.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.