RICHARD CECIL MARTIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RICHARD CECIL MARTIN, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. STATE OF FLORIDA, CASE NO. 1D05-2100 Appellee. ___________________________/ Opinion filed December 22, 2005. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Linda Nobles, Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm, but remand in order that a written order memorializing the revocation can be entered. See, e.g., Koch v. State, 888 So. 2d 736, 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Oliver v. State, 819 So. 2d 816, 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (affirming appellant s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence, but because no order revoking appellant s probation had been entered, remanding for entry of written order consistent with the trial court s oral pronouncement); Walker v. State, 686 So. 2d 758, 758-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (affirming and remanding for the trial court to enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant s probation ); Clark v. State, 510 So. 2d 1202, 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) ( While we find no reversible error in the trial court s oral findings, we remand for the entry of a written order conforming to the oral pronouncements. ). Affirmed; remanded with instructions. ERVIN, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.