JOHN JAMES MAGRI, IV v. DEBORAH BRENNAN MAGRI

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOHN JAMES MAGRI, IV, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED. CASE NO.: 1D04-1745 DEBORAH BRENNAN MAGRI, Appellee. _________________________/ Opinion filed June 20, 2005. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. David C. Wiggins, Judge. David A. Garfinkel of Rogers Towers, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant. James G. Roberts of Roberts & Reiter, P.A. and Michael J. Korn of Korn & Zehmer, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. John James Magri, IV, appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage arguing that the trial court erred in making an unequal distribution of marital assets to his former wife, Deborah Brennan Magri, appellee. As a general rule, under section 61.075(1), Florida Statutes (2002), marital assets should be distributed equally. Nevertheless, "[t]he trial court may make an unequal distribution of assets, provided the court supplies a specific finding of fact to justify its unequal distribution." Guida v. Guida, 870 So. 2d 222, 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); see also Krafchuk v. Krafchuk, 804 So. 2d 376, 380 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)("[T]here can be unequal distribution if justifications for disparity exist."). Here, the trial court made more than adequate findings to support the unequal distribution, including the distribution of the former wife s vested and unvested stock options, and the findings are supported by competent substantial evidence in the record. Accordingly, we affirm all issues raised on appeal. AFFIRMED. WOLF, C.J., VAN NORTWICK AND BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.