Marquis C. Hilson v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED MARQUIS CORTEZ HILSON, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D14-588 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed October 17, 2014 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Charles J. Roberts, Judge. Marquis C. Hilson, Jasper, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Marquis Cortez Hilson (defendant) appeals the trial court's order summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He raised seven claims in his motion. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse as to claims 1, 2, and 5. We affirm as to all other claims. The defendant was found guilty of first-degree premeditated murder and sentenced to a term of life imprisonment. In claims 1, 2, and 5, the defendant alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him not to testify, for failing to prepare him to testify, for failing to present his testimony, and for failing to properly present a defense of self-defense. The State properly concedes that claims 1, 2, and 5 should be remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing, since the defendant's motion sufficiently alleges facts to establish a prima facie case under the test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). As to all other claims, we affirm. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED. TORPY, C.J., PALMER and COHEN, JJ., concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
