Redden v. Colvin, No. 5:2014cv04452 - Document 10 (S.D.W. Va. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the 9 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge, and ORDERS that the Defendant's 8 Motion to Remand be GRANTED and that this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) for further proceedings as outlined in the Defendant's motion. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 5/6/2014. (cc: Magistrate Judge Tinsley; attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION MARY LOU REDDEN, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-04452 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order (Document 4) entered on February 2, 2014, this action was referred to the Honorable Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B). On April 15, 2014, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 9) wherein it is recommended that this Court grant the Defendant s Motion to Remand (Document 8) and remand the case to the Commissioner pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings as outlined in the Defendant s motion. Objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by May 2, 2014. Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the 1 factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); see also Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983) (holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and ORDERS that the Defendant s Motion to Remand (Document 8) be GRANTED and that this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings as outlined in the Defendant s motion. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge Tinsley, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party. ENTER: 2 May 6, 2014
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
