Adams v. O'Malley, No. 3:2023cv00551 - Document 9 (S.D.W. Va. 2024)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn; denying the Plaintiff's 5 request for remand; granting the Defendant's 6 request to affirm; affirming the final decision of the Commissioner; and dismissing this matter from this Court's docket. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 1/23/2024. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)

Download PDF
Adams v. O'Malley Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION ROSE A., Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-0551 MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted Findings of Fact and recommended that the Court deny the Plaintiff’s request for remand (ECF No. 5), grant the Defendant’s request to affirm (ECF No. 6), affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this matter from this Court’s docket. No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation have been filed. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES the Plaintiff’s request for remand (ECF No. 5), GRANTS the Defendant’s request to affirm (ECF No. 6), AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner, and DISMISSES this matter from this Court’s docket, consistent with the findings and recommendation. Dockets.Justia.com The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: January 23, 2024 ROBERT C. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.