Huddleston v. United States of America, No. 3:2013cv21672 - Document 131 (S.D.W. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Orders that Movant's 124 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence be Denied and that this civil action be Dismissed with prejudice, and Removed from the docket of this Court, consistent with the 130 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 10/30/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)

Download PDF
Huddleston v. United States of America Doc. 131 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION SIDNEY EDWARD HUDDLESTON III, Movant, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-21672 (CRIMINAL No. 3:10-00042) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 124) be denied and that this civil action be dismissed, with prejudice, and removed from the docket of this Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ORDERS that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 124) be DENIED and that this civil action be DISMISSED with prejudice, and REMOVED from the docket of this Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: October 30, 2014 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.