Borjas-Hernandez v. United States of America, No. 3:2012cv08368 - Document 139 (S.D.W. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court accepts and incorporates herein the 138 Proposed Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and Denies Movant's 128 Motion/Application/Petition to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Joel Adolfo Borjas-Hernandez; Dismisses this action, with prejudice, and Removes it from the docket of this Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 4/17/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION JOEL ADOLFO BORJAS-HERNANDEZ, Movant, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-8368 (Criminal No. 3:09-00163) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that Movant s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 128) be denied; and this civil action be dismissed, with prejudice, and removed from the docket of this Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES Movant s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 128); DISMISSES this civil action, with prejudice, and REMOVES it from the docket of this Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: April 17, 2014

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.