Deel v. West Virginia EMS Technical Support Network, Inc. et al, No. 2:2006cv01064 - Document 67 (S.D.W. Va. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER This litigation having been stayed on 8/27/2007 pending resolution of the coverage issue herein, and the issue having been resolved by the 66 memorandum opinion and order entered this day, the clerk is directed to reflect that this action was retired to the inactive docket as of 8/28/2007 and reinstated to the active docket on 7/23/2009. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/23/2009 and entered nunc pro tunc 8/27/2007. (ras)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Deel v. West Virginia EMS Technical Support Network, Inc. et al Doc. 67 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON BRADFORD W. DEEL, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. Civil Action No. 2:06-1064 WEST VIRGINIA EMS TECHNICAL SUPPORT NETWORK, INC., a West Virginia Corporation, JOE RICHARDS, Chief Executive Officer of WEST VIRGINIA EMS TECHNICAL SUPPORT NETWORK, INC., MARGARET COLLINS, Program Administrator for the Medley/Hartley Advocacy Program of WEST VIRGINIA EMS TECHNICAL SUPPORT NETWORK, INC., and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. Defendants/Counterclaimant. O R D E R On August 28, 2007, the court entered an agreed order staying this litigation in its entirety pending resolution of the coverage issue presented in the case. In a memorandum opinion and order entered this same day, the court has resolved the coverage issue. Inasmuch as case activity practically ceased between August 28, 2007, and July 23, 2009, while the aforementioned coverage issue was under consideration, the court ORDERS, Dockets.Justia.com effective August 28, 2007, that the Clerk be, and she hereby is, directed to reflect this action as having been retired to the inactive docket as of August 28, 2007, and reinstated to the active docket on July 23, 2009. DATED: July 23, 2009 Entered nunc pro tunc August 28, 2007 John T. Copenhaver, Jr. United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
