Smith v. Gaither, No. 1:2008cv00968 - Document 14 (S.D.W. Va. 2009)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 13 the PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort; DENYING plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis; DENYING the petition for writ of habeas corpus (2241); DE NYING 8 and 9 plaintiff's motions for summary judgment; DISMISSING this case and DIRECTING the Clerk to remove it from the Court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 9/2/2009. (cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se and counsel of record) (arb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD RODNEY EUGENE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-0968 JOHN GAITHER, C.C.M., Federal Bureau of Prisons, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for submission of findings and recommendations regarding disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge VanDervort submitted to the court his Findings and Recommendation on August 7, 2009, in which he recommended that the District Court deny plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, deny plaintiff's motions for summary judgment, and remove this case from the court's active docket. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b), the parties were allotted ten days, plus three mailing days, in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge VanDervort s Findings and Recommendation. The failure of any party to file such objections constitutes a waiver of such party's right to a de novo review by this court. Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989). The parties failed to file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation within either thirteen-day period. Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge VanDervort, the court adopts the findings and recommendations contained therein. 1. Accordingly, the court hereby: DENIES plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis; 2. DENIES the petition for writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241; 3. DENIES plaintiff's motions for summary judgment; 4. DISMISSES this case, and 5. DIRECTS the Clerk to remove it from the court s active docket. The Clerk is further directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to plaintiff, pro se, and counsel of record. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2009. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
