Ryan v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, No. 5:2009cv00055 - Document 11 (N.D.W. Va. 2009)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Declining To Affirm And Adopt Report and Recommendation re 8 Of Mag Judge And granting 9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P Stamp, Jr on 10/1/09. (mji)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA TIMOTHY RYAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 5:09CV55 (STAMP) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DECLINING TO AFFIRM AND ADOPT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE I. Procedural History The plaintiff, Timothy Ryan, filed a complaint to review the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny benefits. The plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis.1 The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull for submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B). pursuant to 28 U.S.C. The magistrate judge denied the plaintiff s request to proceed in forma pauperis because the plaintiff failed to use the proper form. Upon submitting his report, Magistrate Judge Kaull informed the parties that if they objected to any portion of his report and recommendation, they must file written objections within ten days after being served with a copy of the report. 1 The plaintiff filed objections. In forma pauperis describes the permission granted to a poor person to proceed without liability for court fees or costs. Black s Law Dictionary 779 (7th ed. 1999). II. Applicable Law Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court must conduct a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate recommendation to which objection is timely made. judge s As to those portions of a recommendation to which no objection is made, a magistrate judge s findings and recommendation will be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous. Supp. 825 (E.D. Cal. 1979). See Webb v. Califano, 458 F. Because the plaintiff has filed objections, this Court will undertake a de novo review as to those portions of the report and recommendation to which objections were made. III. Discussion To proceed in forma pauperis, a plaintiff need not demonstrate absolute destitution. Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 Rather, under Adkins, a plaintiff need U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948). only demonstrate that substantial burden. the Id. payment of court costs imposes a The magistrate judge found that the plaintiff has not submitted the proper IFP application form with information concerning the income and assets of the plaintiff s spouse. A review of the record indicates that the plaintiff has now submitted a complete IFP application form and has communicated with this Court in his objections to explain his reasons for noncompliance. After reviewing the record de novo, this Court finds plaintiff that the has shown 2 good cause to allow the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis and declines to follow the magistrate judge s recommendation. IV. Conclusion Based upon a de novo review, this Court finds that it should decline to adopt the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge based upon circumstances presented after the report and recommendation. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the plaintiff s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to counsel of record herein. DATED: October 1, 2009 /s/ Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. FREDERICK P. STAMP, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.