Hardy v. Saad, No. 3:2015cv00086 - Document 34 (N.D.W. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: the Court OVERRULES the Petitioner's objections; the Court ORDERS Magistrate Judge Seibert's 28 Report and Recommendation ADOPTED for the reasons more fully stated therein; Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 1 petition is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Insofar as the Petitioner raises arguments that fall under § 2255, he has not met the requirements for issuance of a certificate of appealability. The Clerk is DIRECTED to strike this matter from the Court's active docket, enter a separate judgment in favor of the Respondent. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 2/13/2017. Copy mailed to pro se petitioner by CMRR at his last known address as shown on the docket. (cwm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/13/2017: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cwm).

Download PDF
Hardy v. Saad Doc. 34 Att. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.