Buffey v. Coleman
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Petitioner's 2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joseph A. Buffey, be denied. Objections to R&R due by 10/17/2005. Signed by Judge John S. Kaull on 9/30/05. (copy Petitioner)(cnd)
<![CDATA[
Buffey v. Coleman
Doc. 6
Case 2:05-cv-00070-REM-JSK
Document 6
Filed 09/30/2005
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA JOSEPH A. BUFFEY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:05CV70 (Judge Maxwell)
THOMAS McBRIDE, Warden, Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED On September 19, 2005, the pro se petitioner, filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. He also filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In his application, the petitioner states that he earns $55.00 per month. Further, his ledger sheet reveals that the petitioner had an account balance of $111.39 as of September 14, 2005. Accordingly, the petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied and he should be ordered to pay the full filing fee. The petitioner should also be warned that the failure to pay the full filing fee within the time allowed by the Court will result in the dismissal of his petition. The petitioner may file, within ten (10) days after being served with a copy of this Recommendation, with the Clerk of the Court, written objections identifying the portions of the Recommendation to which objections are made, and the basis for such objections. A copy of such objections should also be submitted to the Honorable Robert E. Maxwell, United States District Judge. Failure to timely file objections to the Recommendation set forth above will result in waiver
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-00070-REM-JSK
Document 6
Filed 09/30/2005
Page 2 of 2
of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based upon such Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1208 (1984); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Report and Recommendation to the pro se petitioner. DATED: September 30, 2005 /s John S. Kaull JOHN S. KAULL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
