Pajak v. Under Armour, Inc. et al, No. 1:2019cv00160 - Document 515 (N.D.W. Va. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT BRIAN BOUCHER ECF. NO. 508 Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 9/9/21. (mh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pajak v. Under Armour, Inc. et al Doc. 515 Case 1:19-cv-00160-IMK-MJA Document 515 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6516 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CLARKSBURG CYNTHIA D. PAJAK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:19-CV-160 (JUDGE KEELEY) UNDER ARMOUR, INC., UNDER ARMOUR RETAIL, INC., AND BRIAN BOUCHER, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT BRIAN BOUCHER [ECF. NO. 508] This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to a Referral Order [ECF No. 510] entered by Honorable Senior United States District Judge Irene M. Keeley on August 31, 2021. By this Referral Order, Judge Keeley referred Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony of Brian Boucher [ECF No. 508] to the undersigned for a hearing and disposition. To this end, the undersigned also is in receipt of Plaintiff’s memorandum in support of her motion [ECF No. 509] as well as Boucher’s response, thereto. [ECF No. 513]. The undersigned scheduled the matter for hearing for September 10, 2021. [ECF No. 511]. However, on September 8, 2021, Plaintiff’s counsel advised chambers staff that the parties reached agreement as to the matters raised in Plaintiff’s motion and that the hearing set for September 10, 2021 is unnecessary. Specifically, per Plaintiff’s counsel, the agreement the parties reached is as follows: Under Armour withdraws its instructions to Boucher not to answer certain questions lodged during his previous deposition; Plaintiff agrees not to use Under Armour’s withdrawals to support any argument that Defendants have waived attorney-client privilege or work product protections; and Boucher will make himself available for further deposition as to 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:19-cv-00160-IMK-MJA Document 515 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 6517 certain areas of inquiry. Counsel for both Boucher and Under Armour advised chambers staff that they were in agreement with these representations by Plaintiff’s counsel. Accordingly, based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion [ECF No. 508] is DENIED as moot. The motion hearing set before the undersigned on September 10, 2021 is hereby CANCELLED and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to remove said hearing from the Court’s docket. It is all so ORDERED. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to provide a copy of this Order to any parties who appear pro se and all counsel of record, as provided in the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing in the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. DATED: September 9, 2021. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
