Andersen et al v. Lewis McChord Communities LLC et al, No. 3:2021cv05391 - Document 65 (W.D. Wash. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER granting Parties' 64 Stipulated MOTION for Agreement re Discovery of ESI. Signed by U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo.(MW)

Download PDF
Andersen et al v. Lewis McChord Communities LLC et al Doc. 65 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 1 of 14 1 The Honorable David G. Estudillo 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 Kylee Andersen, et al.; Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE 10 Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 13 14 Lewis McChord Communities LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Lincoln Military Housing Lewis McChord PM LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; 15 STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: December 8, 2022 Defendants. 16 17 The parties hereby stipulate to the following provisions regarding the discovery of 18 19 electronically stored information (“ESI”) in this matter: 20 A. 21 22 General Principles 1. An attorney’s zealous representation of a client is not compromised by conducting discovery in a cooperative manner. The failure of counsel or the parties to litigation to cooperate 23 in facilitating and reasonably limiting discovery requests and responses raises litigation costs and 24 25 26 contributes to the risk of sanctions. STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 1 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 2 of 14 2. 1 As provided in LCR 26(f), the proportionality standard set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 2 26(b)(1) must be applied in each case when formulating a discovery plan. To further the 3 application of the proportionality standard in discovery, requests for production of ESI and related 4 responses should be reasonably targeted, clear, and as specific as possible. 5 6 B. ESI Disclosures Within 30 days of entry of this Order, or at a later time if agreed to by the parties, each 7 8 9 party shall disclose: 1. Custodians. The five custodians most likely to have discoverable ESI in their 10 possession, custody, or control. The custodians shall be identified by name, title, connection to 11 the instant litigation, and the type of the information under the custodian’s control. 12 13 2. Non-custodial Data Sources. A list of non-custodial data sources (e.g., shared drives, servers), if any, likely to contain discoverable ESI. 14 3. Third-Party Data Sources. A list of third-party data sources, if any, likely to 15 16 contain discoverable ESI (e.g., third-party email providers, mobile device providers, cloud 17 storage) and, for each such source, the extent to which a party is (or is not) able to preserve 18 information stored in the third-party data source. 19 20 21 4. Inaccessible Data. A list of data sources, if any, likely to contain discoverable ESI (by type, date, custodian, electronic system or other criteria sufficient to specifically identify the data source) that a party asserts is not reasonably accessible under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(B). 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 2 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 3 of 14 1 2 C. ESI Discovery Procedures 1. On-site inspection of electronic media. Such an inspection shall not be required 3 absent a demonstration by the requesting party of specific need and good cause or by agreement 4 of the parties. 5 6 2. Search methodology. The parties shall timely confer to attempt to reach agreement on appropriate search terms and queries, file type and date restrictions, data sources (including 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 custodians), and other appropriate computer- or technology-aided methodologies, before any such effort is undertaken. The parties shall continue to cooperate in revising the appropriateness of the search methodology. a. Prior to running searches: i. The producing party shall disclose the data sources (including custodians), search terms and queries, any file type and date restrictions, and any other 14 methodology that it proposes to use to locate ESI likely to contain responsive and discoverable 15 16 17 information. The producing party shall provide unique hit counts for each search query. ii. The requesting party is entitled to, within 14 days of the producing 18 party’s disclosure, to add no more than 10 search terms or queries to those disclosed by the 19 producing party absent a showing of good cause or agreement of the parties. 20 21 iii. The following provisions apply to search terms/queries of the requesting party. Focused terms and queries should be employed; broad terms or queries, such 22 as product and company names, generally should be avoided. A conjunctive combination of 23 24 25 26 multiple words or phrases (e.g., “computer” and “system”) narrows the search and shall count as a single search term. A disjunctive combination of multiple words or phrases (e.g., “computer” STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 3 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 4 of 14 1 or “system”) broadens the search, and thus each word or phrase shall count as a separate search 2 term unless they are variants of the same word. The producing party may identify each search 3 term or query returning overbroad results demonstrating the overbroad results and a counter 4 proposal correcting the overbroad search or query. 5 6 b. After production: Within 21 days of the producing party notifying the receiving party that it has substantially completed the production of documents responsive to a 7 8 9 request, the responding party may request no more than 10 additional search terms or queries. The immediately preceding section (Section C(2)(a)(iii)) applies. 3. 10 11 12 Format. a. ESI will be produced to the requesting party according to the specifications outlined in Exhibit A. 13 b. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, files that are not easily converted 14 to image format, such as spreadsheet, database, and drawing files, will be produced in native 15 16 17 format. c. Each document image file shall be named with a unique number (Bates 18 Number). File names should not be more than twenty characters long or contain spaces. When 19 a text-searchable image file is produced, the producing party must preserve the integrity of the 20 underlying ESI, i.e., the original formatting, the metadata (as noted below) and, where applicable, 21 the revision history. 22 d. If a document is more than one page, the unitization of the document and 23 24 any attachments and/or affixed notes shall be maintained as they existed in the original document. 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 4 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 5 of 14 1 4. De-duplication. The parties may de-duplicate their ESI production across 2 custodial and non-custodial data sources after disclosure to the requesting party, and the duplicate 3 custodian information removed during the de-duplication process tracked in a duplicate/other 4 custodian field in the database load file. 5 6 5. Email Threading. The parties may use analytics technology to identify email threads and need only produce the unique most inclusive copy and related family members and 7 8 9 10 may exclude lesser inclusive copies. Upon reasonable request, the producing party will produce a less inclusive copy. 6. Metadata fields. If the requesting party seeks metadata, the parties agree that only 11 the following metadata fields need be produced, and only to the extent it is reasonably accessible 12 and non-privileged: document type; custodian and duplicate custodians (or storage location if no 13 custodian); author/from; recipient/to, cc and bcc; title/subject; email subject; file name; file size; 14 file extension; original file path; date and time created, sent modified and/or received; and hash 15 16 value. The list of metadata type is intended to be flexible and may be changed by agreement of 17 the parties, particularly in light of advances and changes in technology, vendor, and business 18 practices. 19 7. 20 21 Hard-Copy Documents. If the parties elect to produce hard-copy documents in an electronic format, the production of hard-copy documents will include a cross-reference file that indicates document breaks and sets forth the custodian or custodian/location associated with each 22 produced document. Hard-copy documents images will match the specifications outlined in 23 24 25 26 Exhibit A and will be scanned using Optical Character Recognition technology and searchable ASCII text files will be produced (or Unicode text format if the text is in a foreign language), STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 5 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 6 of 14 1 unless the producing party can show that the cost would outweigh the usefulness of scanning (for 2 example, when the condition of the paper is not conducive to scanning and will not result in 3 accurate or reasonably useable/searchable ESI). Each file will be named with a unique Bates 4 Number (e.g., the unique Bates Number of the first page of the corresponding production version 5 6 of the document followed by its file extension). D. Preservation of ESI 7 8 9 The parties acknowledge that they have a common law obligation, as expressed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e), to take reasonable and proportional steps to preserve discoverable information in 10 the party’s possession, custody, or control. With respect to preservation of ESI, the parties agree 11 as follows: 12 13 1. Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the parties shall not be required to modify the procedures used by them in the ordinary course of business to back-up and 14 archive data; provided, however, that the parties shall preserve all discoverable ESI in their 15 16 17 possession, custody, or control. 2. The parties will supplement their disclosures in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 18 26(e) with discoverable ESI responsive to a particular discovery request or mandatory disclosure 19 where that data is created after a disclosure or response is made (unless excluded under Sections 20 (D)(3) or (E)(1)-(2)). 21 3. Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the following categories 22 of ESI need not be preserved: 23 24 25 26 a. Deleted, slack, fragmented, or other data only accessible by forensics. b. Random access memory (RAM), temporary files, or other ephemeral data that are difficult to preserve without disabling the operating system. STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 6 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 7 of 14 1 c. On-line access data such as temporary internet files, history, cache, cookies, and the like. d. Data in metadata fields that are frequently updated automatically, such as last-opened dates (see also Section (E)(5)). e. Back-up data that are duplicative of data that are more accessible elsewhere. f. Server, system or network logs. g. Data remaining from systems no longer in use that is unintelligible on the systems in use. h. Electronic data (e.g., email, calendars, contact data, and notes) sent to or from mobile devices (e.g., iPhone, iPad, Android devices), provided that a copy of all such electronic data is automatically saved in real time elsewhere (such as on a server, laptop, desktop computer, or “cloud” storage). 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 E. Privilege 1. A producing party shall create a privilege log of all documents fully withheld from 15 production on the basis of a privilege or protection, unless otherwise agreed or excepted by this 16 Agreement and Order. Privilege logs shall include a unique identification number for each 17 document and the basis for the claim (attorney-client privileged or work-product protection). For 18 ESI, the privilege log may be generated using available metadata, including author/recipient or 19 20 to/from/cc/bcc names; the subject matter or title; and date created. Should the available metadata 21 provide insufficient information for the purpose of evaluating the privilege claim asserted, the 22 producing party shall include such additional information as required by the Federal Rules of 23 Civil Procedure. Privilege logs will be produced to all other parties no later than 30 days before 24 the deadline for filing motions related to discovery (see Dkt. 58). 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 7 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 8 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 2. Redactions need not be logged so long as the basis for the redaction is clear on the redacted document. 3. With respect to privileged or work-product information generated after the filing of the complaint, parties are not required to include any such information in privilege logs. 4. Activities undertaken in compliance with the duty to preserve information are protected from disclosure and discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(A) and (B). 7 8 9 5. Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the production of any documents in this proceeding shall not, for the purposes of this proceeding or any other federal or state proceeding, 10 constitute a waiver by the producing party of any privilege applicable to those documents, 11 including the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product protection, or any other privilege 12 or protection recognized by law. Information produced in discovery that is protected as privileged 13 or work product shall be immediately returned to the producing party, and its production shall not 14 constitute a waiver of such protection. 15 16 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. DATED: December 8, 2022 /s/Joel B. Ard, WSBA No.40104 Attorneys for Plaintiff DATED: December 8, 2022 /s/Susan S. Smith, WSBA No. 55808 Attorneys for Defendant 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 8 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 9 of 14 ORDER 1 2 Based on the foregoing, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 DATED: 12/14/2022 4 5 The Honorable David G. Estudillo UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 9 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 10 of 14 EXHIBIT A – PRODUCTION FORMAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Cover Letter A cover letter shall be included with each production and shall include information sufficient to identify all accompanying media (hard drive, thumb drive, DVD, CD, secure FTP), shall identify each production on such media by assigning a Production Volume name or number, and shall include the Bates range for the documents produced in each volume. 7 8 9 2. Production Load Files There will be two Load/Unitization files accompanying all productions of ESI. The first 10 will be a Metadata import file, in Concordance-format delimited file with a .DAT file extension, 11 that contains the agreed upon Metadata fields in UTF-8 encoding. 12 13 The second will be a cross-reference file that contains the corresponding image information identifying document breaks. The acceptable formats for the cross-reference files 14 .log and .opt. 15 16 Image Load Files: 17 1. The name of the image load file shall mirror the name of the delivery volume. 18 2. Shall have the appropriate extension (e.g., ABC001.OPT). 19 3. The volume names shall be consecutive (e.g., ABC001, ABC002, et seq.). 20 4. There shall be one row in the load file for every TIFF image in the production. 21 5. Every image in the delivery volume shall be cross-referenced in the image load file. 22 6. The image ID key shall be named the same as the Bates Number of the page. 23 24 25 26 7. Load files shall not span across media (e.g., CDs, DVDs, hard drives, etc.), i.e., a separate volume shall be created for each piece of media delivered. STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 10 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 11 of 14 1 8. Files that are the first page of a logical document shall include a “Y” where 2 appropriate. Subsequent pages of all documents (regular document, email, or 3 attachment) shall include a blank in the appropriate position. 4 5 6 Concordance Data Load Files: 1. Data load files shall be produced in Concordance .DAT format. 2. The data load file shall use standard Concordance delimiters: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 a. Comma - ¶ (ASCII 20): b. Quote - (ASCII 254); and c. Newline - ® (ASCII 174). 3. The first line of the .DAT file shall contain the field names arranged in the same order as the data is arranged in subsequent lines. 4. All date fields shall be produced in mm/dd/yyyy format. 14 5. All attachments shall sequentially follow the parent document/email. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 6. Use carriage-return to indicate the start of the next record. 7. Load files shall not span across media (e.g., CDs, DVDs, hard drives, etc.); a separate volume shall be created for each piece of media delivered. 8. The name of the data load file shall mirror the name of the delivery volume, and shall have a .DAT extension (e.g., AMC001.DAT). 9. The volume names shall be consecutive (e.g., ABC001, ABC002, et seq.). 22 10. If foreign language/Unicode text exists, the .DAT file shall be in UTF-8 or UTF-16 23 24 format where appropriate, consistent with this ESI Protocol. 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 11 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 12 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 OCR/Extracted Text Files: 1. OCR or Extracted Text files shall be provided in a separate \TEXT\ directory containing document level text files. 2. If Foreign Language/Unicode text exists, TEXT files shall be in appropriate UTF-8 or UTF-16 format. 3. Images 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Parties shall produce documents in Single Page Group IV TIFF black and white files. Documents shall have an Image resolution of 300 DPI. Paper size shall be 8.5 x 11 inches unless in the reasonable judgment of the producing party, a particular item requires a different size. If a receiving party reasonably deems the quality of the document produced in TIFF format to be insufficient, the parties will meet and confer in good faith to determine whether the 14 producing party must produce the document in a Native Format, or as a JPEG file, and whether 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 such document must be produced as a color image. File Naming Convention: Match Bates Number of the page. Original document orientation or corrected orientation shall be retained. 4. ESI (and Paper to the Extent Applicable) Production Metadata Fields Field Name BegBates EndBates 23 24 BegAttach Description Beginning Bates Number. Ending Bates Number. Beginning Bates Number of the first Document in a Document family range. Documents that are part of Document families, i.e., containing parents and attachments, should receive a value. 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 12 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 13 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Field Name Description Ending Bates number of the last Document in attachment range in a Document Family range. Documents that are part of Document Families, i.e., containing parents or attachments, EndAttach should receive a value. Populated for Email parent records and indicates the number of attachments that constitute the whole family (BegAttach to AttachmentCount EndAttach) Name of the Custodian of the Document Produced, to the Custodian extent reasonably and technically available. The AllCustodian field shall reference the Name(s) of all Custodian(s) who were in possession of a de-duplicated AllCustodian Document, to the extent reasonably and technically available. FileName Filename of the original source ESI. NativeLink Path and filename to produced Native Format file EmailSubject Subject line extracted from an Email. Title Title field extracted from the Metadata of a non-Email. Author Author field extracted from the Metadata of a non-Email. From From or Sender field extracted from an Email. To To or Recipient field extracted from an Email. CC CC or Carbon Copy field extracted from an Email. BCC BCC or Blind Carbon Copy field extracted from an Email. DateSent Sent date of an Email (mm/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss format). DateReceived Received date of an Email (mm/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss format). DateCreated Creation date of a file (mm/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss format). DateLastModified Last modification date (mm/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss format). DateLastPrinted The date the Document was last printed. DateAccessed The last accessed date of the Document. File Extension File extension of Document (.msg, .doc, .xls, etc.). Full Text File path to full text/OCR File. “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential,” if a Document has been so designated under any Stipulated Protective Order filed Confidentiality with the Court; otherwise, blank. HASHValue MD5 or SHA Hash value of the file. The path to the original folder in which the Document was FolderPath located. FileSize (in bytes) Size of the file in bytes. PageCount The number of pages in the file. Bates Number of the first page of the parent item to the Bates AttachRange Number of the last page of the last attachment “child” item. STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 13 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800 Case 3:21-cv-05391-DGE Document 65 Filed 12/14/22 Page 14 of 14 1 Field Name 2 RecordType 3 Application Production Volume 4 5 6 Redacted Description To indicate “Paper,” “Hard Copy,” or “HC” if a Hard Copy Document and “ESI” if it is an ESI item. Indicates software application that generated the ESI item (e.g., Outlook, Word). Production volume name or number. User-generated field that will indicate redactions. “X,” “Y,” “Yes,” “True,” are all acceptable indicators that the Document is redacted. Otherwise, blank. 7 8 9 10 5. System Files Common system files defined by the N1st library (http: www/nsrl.nist.gov/) need not be produced. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER (Case No. 3:21-cv-05391-DGE) - 14 BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. 600 University Street, Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 315-4800

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.