Jury v. Roher et al
Filing
30
ORDER granting 29 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to 26 Show Cause or File his Amended Complaint to 1/13/2013, signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (GMR: cc- pltf)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
4
5
JERRY M. JURY,
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
L. ROHER, DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, CLINT MAY, PAT
GLEBE, ELDON VAIL, BERNARD
WARNER, LT. BUTLER, DEVON
SCHRUM, DUNIVAN J. DANE,
CATHERINE M. SLAGLE, GRAYS
HARBOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE, KEN
FURU, WARSHAM, UNIT-H6 OFFICERS,
WAKEFIELD, CARPENTER,
HUTCHINSON, STROUP, JOHNSON,
RENINGER, CORNEWELL, MICHAEL L.
MELOTRICH, RON WINEINGER, I&I
STAFF, WHALEY, SGT. CLARK, DONNY,
SCCC PROPERTY ROOM OFFICIALS,
SHAIRLY I. ZAT, LEGAL LIASON JOHN
AND JANE DOES 1-10,
18
19
20
No. C12-5772 BHS/KLS
v.
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE
Defendants.
By Order dated October 17, 2012, Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this matter
should not be dismissed or, alternatively to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies
21
22
outlined in the Court’s order. ECF No. 26. Plaintiff was given a deadline to amend or show
23
cause by November 16, 2012. Id. On November 20, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension
24
of time requesting an extension of the deadline for thirty or sixty days. ECF No. 29. Plaintiff
25
states that he has been ill and his access to library time is limited. Id.
26
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
ORDER - 1
1
(1)
Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED. Plaintiff
2
must show cause or file his amended complaint on or before January 11, 2013, or the Court
3
will recommend dismissal of this action.
4
(2)
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.
5
6
7
DATED this 30th day of November, 2012.
8
9
A
10
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER - 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
