Stewart v. M&T Mortgage Corporation et al
Filing
28
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle denying 26 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 27 Motion for Ratification.(TG; cc mailed to plaintiff)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
6
7
8 ROGER ALLAN STEWART,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11 M&T MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et
al.,
12
Defendants.
13
CASE NO. C12-5741 BHS
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION AND
MOTION FOR RATIFICATION
14
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Roger Allan Stewart’s (“Stewart”)
15
motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 26) and motion for ratification (Dkt. 27).
16
On November 6, 2012, the Court granted Defendant Lawyers Title Insurance
17
Company’s motion to dismiss and sua sponte dismissed Stewart’s complaint with
18
prejudice against all parties because Stewart’s complaint to quiet title was frivolous and
19
completely without merit. Dkt. 24 at 3. Stewart’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 26) is
20
likewise without merit and therefore DENIED. Stewart’s motion for ratification is filled
21
22
ORDER - 1
1 with cites, rules, and requests, yet it is completely without merit. Therefore, the Court
2 DENIES Stewart’s motion for ratification.
3
The Clerk is directed to make a separate entry on the docket stating that any
4 further filings will become part of the electronic docket but will not be considered by the
5 Court.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated this 19th day of November, 2012.
A
8
9
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
