Mitchell v. State of Washington et al

Filing 29

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 27 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' 25 MOTION to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.Plainitff's response to Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss is due on or before 12/17/2012. Defendants reply is due on or before 12/21/12. The Defendants' 25 MOTION to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is re-noted for 12/21/2012. (GMR- cc: pltf)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 6 GEORGE O. MITCHELL, No. C12-5403 BHS/KLS 7 Plaintiff, v. 8 9 10 11 STATE OF WASHINGTON, KELLY J CUNNINGHAM, THOMAS BELL, RANDALL GRIFFITH, CHRISTINE HAUETER, ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff requests a thirty day extension of time to respond to Defendant Christine 14 Haueter’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 27. Defendant Haueter’s motion to dismiss is presently 15 noted for November 16, 2012. ECF No. 25. Defendant Haueter does not object to a thirty day 16 extension. ECF No. 28. 17 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 18 19 (1) Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED. 20 (2) Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before 21 December 17, 2012. Defendants reply is due on or before December 21, 2012. The Clerk is 22 directed to re-note Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 25) for December 21, 2012. 23 // 24 // 25 26 // ORDER - 1 1 2 (3) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to counsel for Defendants. 3 4 DATED this 16th day of November, 2012. 5 A 6 7 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?