Mitchell v. State of Washington et al
Filing
29
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 27 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' 25 MOTION to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.Plainitff's response to Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss is due on or before 12/17/2012. Defendants reply is due on or before 12/21/12. The Defendants' 25 MOTION to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is re-noted for 12/21/2012. (GMR- cc: pltf)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
4
5
6
GEORGE O. MITCHELL,
No. C12-5403 BHS/KLS
7
Plaintiff,
v.
8
9
10
11
STATE OF WASHINGTON, KELLY J
CUNNINGHAM, THOMAS BELL,
RANDALL GRIFFITH, CHRISTINE
HAUETER,
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO
DISMISS
Defendants.
12
13
Plaintiff requests a thirty day extension of time to respond to Defendant Christine
14
Haueter’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 27. Defendant Haueter’s motion to dismiss is presently
15
noted for November 16, 2012. ECF No. 25. Defendant Haueter does not object to a thirty day
16
extension. ECF No. 28.
17
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
18
19
(1)
Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED.
20
(2)
Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before
21
December 17, 2012. Defendants reply is due on or before December 21, 2012. The Clerk is
22
directed to re-note Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 25) for December 21, 2012.
23
//
24
//
25
26
//
ORDER - 1
1
2
(3)
The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to counsel for
Defendants.
3
4
DATED this 16th day of November, 2012.
5
A
6
7
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?