Holtz v. Karr
Filing
51
ORDER granting 46 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motin to dismiss may be filed on or before 1/14/13. Defendants may flie their reply on or before 1/18/13. The Clerk is directed to RE-NOTEe Defendants' 41 MOTION to Dismiss for 1/18/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
4
5
RON HOLTZ,
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
No. C12-5111 RJB/KLS
MARTHA KARR, MARVIN SPENCER,
C KOLLIN, SHARLA JAMES
HUTCHISON, K MILLER, BRASWELL,
JUDY SNOW, DANNY OTA, M
JOURNEY, RICHARD ODEGARD,
PIERCE COUNTY DETENTION AND
CORRECTIONS CENTER, MICHAEL
KAWAMURA, RICHARD WHITEHEAD,
DEPARTMENT OF ASSIGNED COUNSEL,
14
15
ORDER GRANTING SECOND
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendants.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion for an extension of time to respond to
16
Defendants’ motion to dismiss. ECF No. 46. Plaintiff was sentenced on September 21, 2012
17
and anticipated a transfer from the Pierce County Jail to the Washington Correction Center in
18
Shelton, Washington on or about September 25, 2012. ECF No. 43-1. Defendants’ motion to
19
dismiss (ECF No. 41) was originally noted for October 12, 2012. ECF No. 41. Plaintiff’s first
20
motion (ECF No. 43) was granted and extended Plaintiff’s response time until December 10,
21
2012. ECF No. 45.
22
It appears that due to Plaintiff’s transfers, first to Washington Correction Center and
23
then to Monroe Corrections Center (see ECF No. 50), Plaintiff did not receive the Court’s
24
previous Order (ECF No. 45) and has had limited access to his legal materials and a law library.
25
Plaintiff requests an additional extension to respond to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
26
Defendants have not filed a response to Plaintiffs’ request.
ORDER - 1
1
2
Under these circumstances, the Court finds Plaintiff’s request for an extension to be
reasonable. It is, accordingly, ORDERED:
3
(1)
Plaintiff’s motion for an extension (ECF No. 46) is GRANTED.
4
(2)
Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss may be filed on or before
5
January 14, 20131. Defendants may file their reply on or before January 18, 2013. The
6
Clerk is directed to re-note Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 41) for January 18, 2013.
7
8
(3)
The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to counsel for
Defendants.
9
DATED this 16th day of November, 2012.
10
A
11
12
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
The date requested by Plaintiff is a Sunday and the next day is a federal holiday. Therefore, the extension will be
granted for January 14th, giving Plaintiff more than ample time to file his response.
ORDER - 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
