Foster v. Astrue
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 18 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
11
CASEY A. FOSTER
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
CASE NO. C11-6070 RJB
v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AFFIRMING
COMMISSIONER’S DECISION
DENYING BENEFITS
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of
Social Security
Defendant.
16
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the U.S.
17
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, recommending that the Court affirm the decision of the
18
Social Security Administration that denied Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance
19
benefits. Dkt. 18. The Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
20
The Court must uphold a decision of Defendant based on substantial evidence and free of
21
legal error. Burch v. Barnhart, 400 F.3d 676, 679 (9th Cir. 2005); 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The
22
Court need only make a de novo determination of the portions of Magistrate Judge Strombom’s
23
Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff makes objections. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AFFIRMING
COMMISSIONER’S DECISION DENYING
BENEFITS- 1
1
The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of
2 Judge Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does
3 hereby find and ORDER:
4
1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
5
2. The administrative decision is AFFIRMED;
6
3. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff’s counsel,
7
Defendant’s counsel and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom.
8
Dated this 19th day of November, 2012.
9
10
11
A
ROBERT J. BRYAN
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AFFIRMING
COMMISSIONER’S DECISION DENYING
BENEFITS- 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
