Florer v. Schrum et al
Filing
105
ORDER granting 101 Defendants' Motion to File Video Under Seal, signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (GMR- cc: ptlf)
<![CDATA[
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
3
4
5
DENNIS FLORER,
6
Plaintiff,
v.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
DEVON SCHRUM, CARLA SCHETTLER,
ALAN WALTER, RICH MOSS, STEVE
SUNDBERG, RON KNIGHT, CHRIS
BOWMAN, STEVE SICLAIRE, STEVE
BARKER, ALAN KUNZ, JOHN
CAMPBELL, WILL PAUL, S. SUKERT,
KURT GRUBB, CANDICE GERMOAU,
JULIE SMITH, SANDY DIIMMEL, AL
MOSLEY, MILES LAWSON, RON
FRAKER, JOHN OYEN, DREW
WALTMAN, GARY PIERCE, MARK
KUCZA, DON HOLLBROOK, GERMAINE
BENSON, LINDA BELANGER, ELDON
VAIL, LAURA WYCKOFF-MEYER,
GUSTAVE MEZA, ALAN ROOKSTOOL,
EDUARDO MICHEL, (FNU) DANIEL,
ERIC JACKSON, and BERNIE WARNER,
18
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO FILE VIDEO UNDER
SEAL
Defendants.
19
20
No. C11-5135 BHS/KLS
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to File Video Under Seal. ECF No. 101.
Plaintiff has filed no response to the motion. Defendants were previously granted a Protective
21
22
Order relating to this video. Pursuant to the Protective Order, Plaintiff was permitted to view,
23
but not possess, the video because Defendants had “asserted bona fide security justifications for
24
limiting Plaintiff’s access to the surveillance video.” ECF No. 99. Defendants now wish to
25
introduce this same video as evidence in support of Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF NO.
26
102.
ORDER - 1
1
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ motion seeking authorization to file
2
prison surveillance video under seal. ECF No. 101. The Clerk of Court is directed to accept the
3
video under seal. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for
4
Defendant.
5
6
DATED this 30th day of November, 2012.
7
A
8
9
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER - 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
