Khalid et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al, No. 2:2019cv00130 - Document 40 (W.D. Wash. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER denying Plaintiff's 39 Motion to Reconsider Judgment Order and Leave to Amend. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com n I. Khalid et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al INTRODUCTION Doc. 40 II. BACKGROUND Id. Id. III. DISCUSSION A. Legal Standard Turner v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R. Co. Id. Carroll v. Nakatani Id Civic Ctr. Square v. Ford (In re Roxford Foods) See generally Carroll B. Claims in First Amended Complaint et seq. Compare with See See id see See Kona Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate of Bishop not Id. C. Claims in Second Amended Complaint See Lee v. Capital One Bank see also See id. Am. Ad. Mgmt., Inc. v. GTE Corp. See See See id. See Walker Process Walker Process Walker Process See Int’l Techs. Consultants, Inc. v. Pilkington PLC Khalid v Citrix Id. See Carroll K-Lath, Div. of Tree Island Wire (USA), Inc. v. Davis Wire Corp. K-Lath K-Lath Walker Process See Walker Process Id. See Id. See Kona Enterprises, Inc. not D. Miscellaneous Claims and Additional Evidence See See id. See See Carroll E. Leave to Amend See Carroll IV. CONCLUSION
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
