Minor Child A et al v. Central Valley School District 356 et al, No. 2:2013cv00094 - Document 47 (E.D. Wash. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER GRANTING 12 STIPULATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (CV, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
Minor Child A et al v. Central Valley School District 356 et al 1 Doc. 47 HONORABLE LONNY R. SUKO 2 3 4 5 6 MICHAEL E. McFARLAND, JR., #23000 Evans, Craven & Lackie, P.S. 818 W. Riverside, Suite 250 Spokane, WA 99201-0910 (509) 455-5200; fax (509) 455-3632 7 8 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 10 11 12 13 KATHLEEN H. PAUKERT as Guardian ad Litem for MINOR CHILD A; and JOHN and JANE DOE, husband and wife and parents of MINOR CHILD A, Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 vs. NO. CV-13-094-LRS ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 356, a political subdivision; DAVE BOUGE, individually and in his capacity as an official of Bowdish Middle School and/or Central Valley School District; LISE LOUER, individually and in her capacity as an official of Bowdish Middle School and/or Central Valley School District; ROBERT JOHNSON, individually and in his capacity as an official of Bowdish Middle School and/or Central Valley School District; and MICHAEL O. PEARSON, individually and in his capacity as an official of Bowdish Middle School and/or Central Valley School District, Defendants. 28 29 30 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - page 1 Evans, Craven &L ackie, P .S . 818 W. Riverside, Suite 250 Spokane, WA 99201-0910 (509) 455-5200; fax (509) 455-3632 Dockets.Justia.com 1 BEFORE THE COURT is the parties Stipulated Motion for Protection 2 (ECF No. 12). This case involves claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title IX and 3 4 5 6 state law arising out of the alleged sexual assault of Minor Child A, who at the time of the alleged occurrence(s) was a student at Central Valley School District (the District). The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”), 20 7 U.S. C. § 1232g establishes protections for certain education records and permits 8 the Department of Education to deny federal funding to a school system that 9 does not comply with its provisions. The Motion requests the court to (1) enter 10 an order allowing Plaintiffs access to and discovery of the names and educational 11 12 13 14 records and information, while at the same time allowing the District to comply with FERPA and protecting the privacy rights of students, and (2) enter an protective order keeping any records produced confidential. 15 The Court finds given the nature of the allegations in this case there is 16 good cause to compel the District to comply with its discovery obligations under 17 Rule 26 after compliance with the notification requirements mandated by 18 FERPA and to enter the parties’ stipulated protective order to protect students’ 19 20 21 22 right to privacy. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The parties Stipulated Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED. The District shall 23 provide Plaintiffs access to and discovery of the student named and educational 24 records relevant to any claim or defense in this case. 25 26 The following procedures shall apply to any documents that identify the names of students or former students of Central Valley School District: 27 28 29 30 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - page 2 Evans, Craven &L ackie, P .S . 818 W. Riverside, Suite 250 Spokane, WA 99201-0910 (509) 455-5200; fax (509) 455-3632 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. The names of any students or former students contained in any documents exchanged in discovery in this case will be deleted from the pleadings and public documents and replaced with the designation of initials or a number. The name and identity of the students involved will continue to be protected from public disclosure unless waived in writing by the former student if over 18 7 years of age, or by a parent, or otherwise required by law. Subject to the 8 foregoing, any document exchanged by the parties in this case that contains the 9 name of any student or former student of Central Valley School District will be 10 treated as “Confidential” and subject to the terms of this Protective Order. Once 11 12 13 14 all names of students and any identifying or otherwise confidential information (i.e., addresses, social security numbers, telephone numbers, etc.) in any document are changed to initials or a number or letter (i.e., student RMP, or 15 student 23), or are otherwise redacted, the “Confidential” restriction on the 16 document will cease to exist. The point of the redacting is to preclude 17 identification of the student by persons not entitled to review the information 18 pursuant to this protective order. 19 20 21 22 2. Central Valley School District will provide the Plaintiffs with unredacted documents responsive to Plaintiffs’ discovery requests. Any student/educational records that may be contained in those records production 23 will be marked “Confidential” (hereinafter, “Confidential documents”) and 24 treated as confidential, subject to this protective order. 25 26 27 3. All parties and their attorneys agree to treat all Confidential documents as confidential, except as necessary to present the parties’ claims in the above-referenced case. Plaintiffs and their attorneys agree not to disseminate 28 29 30 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - page 3 Evans, Craven &L ackie, P .S . 818 W. Riverside, Suite 250 Spokane, WA 99201-0910 (509) 455-5200; fax (509) 455-3632 1 any student names, educational records or any information from any educational 2 records covered by this Order to any third-party, when and only when the 3 4 5 6 specific identify is needed, except to: a. The party(ies), their attorneys and the attorneys’ employees; b. Consultants and experts retained by any party for the purposes of assisting in the preparation or presentation of claims or defenses; 7 8 c. 9 10 11 deposition and/or subpoenas for trial upon student witnesses; d. The court and its personnel; e. Court reporters, their staff and professional vendors to whom 12 disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; 13 14 Any person for the purpose of perfecting service of notices of f. The author or addressee of the document, or the person to which the 15 document or information relates, or the original source of the 16 information; and 17 g. Any other person authorized by the court. 18 4. All of the foregoing persons, other than the parties’ attorneys and 19 20 21 22 23 24 the attorneys’ staff persons working on this case shall be shown a copy of this Order and shall sign it or otherwise signify in writing prior to being shown confidential documents that the person has read the Order and consents to be bound by its terms. 5. Any Confidential documents that are filed with the Court will be 25 reviewed by the party proposing the document, and the names and other 26 identifying details of the students or former students involved will be deleted (or 27 replaced with initials or a student number). The parties will attempt to agree to 28 29 30 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - page 4 Evans, Craven &L ackie, P .S . 818 W. Riverside, Suite 250 Spokane, WA 99201-0910 (509) 455-5200; fax (509) 455-3632 1 any deletions of information in advance. If the parties are unable to agree on the 2 deletion of information, the Court will be requested to review the document in 3 4 5 6 camera and make a determination of what, if any, information should be deleted from the document. 6. Upon completion of this litigation, all copies of the records, 7 documents or deposition testimony with references to students whose actual 8 names are identified shall remain confidential, unless waived, and shall continue 9 to be kept pursuant to the above criteria. 10 11 12 13 14 7. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prejudice or limit any party’s right to use the records in the taking of depositions or at trial to the extent permitted, if at all, under the rules of evidence and civil procedure. 8. Court reporters shall be instructed to transcribe students’ names by 15 the name stated in the deposition but said deposition shall then be treated as 16 confidential until the names are changed to initials or to a student number. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9. Nothing in this Order shall prevent any party hereto from seeking modification of this Order, or from objecting to discovery which it believes to be otherwise improper. 10. Violation of the terms of this Order, by any of the signators to this agreement, their employees, agents or experts, may subject the violator to any sanction deemed appropriate by the Court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file this Order and provide copies to counsel. 26 27 28 29 30 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - page 5 Evans, Craven &L ackie, P .S . 818 W. Riverside, Suite 250 Spokane, WA 99201-0910 (509) 455-5200; fax (509) 455-3632 1 DATED this 10th day of September, 2014. 2 3 s/Lonny R. Suko _______________________________ LONNY R. SUKO Senior United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 PRESENTED BY: 9 10 11 12 13 EVANS, CRAVEN & LACKIE, P.S. By /s/ Michael E. McFarland, Jr. MICHAEL E. McFARLAND, JR., WSBA #23000 Attorneys for Defendants 14 15 EYMANN ALLISON HUNTER JONES, P.S. 16 17 18 19 By /s/ Richard C. Eymann RICHARD C. EYMANN, WSBA #7470 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - page 6 Evans, Craven &L ackie, P .S . 818 W. Riverside, Suite 250 Spokane, WA 99201-0910 (509) 455-5200; fax (509) 455-3632

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.