Lumpkin v. Martin et al, No. 7:2023cv00701 - Document 13 (W.D. Va. 2024)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 4/17/2024. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lumpkin v. Martin et al Doc. 13 $-&3,h4 0''*$& 6 4 %*45 $0635 "5 30"/0,& 7" '*-&% IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT April 17, 2024 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA -"63" " "645*/ $-&3, #: ROANOKE DIVISION s/5. 5BZMPS %&165: $-&3, CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 7:23-cv-00701 MEMORANDUM OPINION v. MAJOR MARTIN, et al., Defendant(s). By: Michael F. Urbanski Chief United States District Judge Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง1983. By order entered March 7, 2024, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 30 days from the date of the order to submit the consent to withholding of filing fees form in order to complete the application to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. More than 30 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff. Entered: April 17, 2024 Michael F. Urbanski Chief U.S. District Judge 2024.04.17 16:41:48 -04'00' Michael F. Urbanski Chief United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
