Pulling et al v. Arms et al, No. 7:2020cv00482 - Document 22 (W.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION as to ANGEL CARTAGENA . Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 9/29/2020. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt) Modified on 9/29/2020-added plaintiff's name to docket text. (slt).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pulling et al v. Arms et al Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION TYLER PULLING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTOPHER ARMS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:20cv00482 MEMORANDUM OPINION By: Hon. Thomas T. Cullen United States District Judge Plaintiff Angel Cartagena, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint1 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 31, 2020, the court directed Cartagena to submit—within 20 days from the date of the order—the consent to filing fee form in order to complete the application to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. (ECF No. 10.) The court advised Cartagena that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of his action without prejudice. More than 20 days have elapsed, and Cartagena has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court will dismiss Cartagena’s action without prejudice. Cartagena may refile his claims in a separate action when he is prepared to comply with the noted conditions. Cartagena was one of several plaintiffs who filed the action. This opinion and accompanying Order are directed only to Cartagena. 1 Dockets.Justia.com The clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to Cartagena. ENTERED this 29th day of September, 2020. ________________________________ HON. THOMAS T. CULLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
