Pulling et al v. Arms et al, No. 7:2020cv00482 - Document 19 (W.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION as to TYLER PULLINGS. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 9/29/2020. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt) Modified on 9/29/2020-added plaintiff's name to docket text. (slt).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pulling et al v. Arms et al Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION TYLER PULLING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTOPHER ARMS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:20cv00482 MEMORANDUM OPINION By: Hon. Thomas T. Cullen United States District Judge Plaintiff Tyler Pulling, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint1 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 31, 2020, the court directed Pulling to submit—within 20 days from the date of the order—the consent to filing fee form in order to complete the application to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. (ECF No. 10.) The court advised Pulling that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of his action without prejudice. More than 20 days have elapsed, and Pulling has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court will dismiss Pulling’s action without prejudice. Pulling may refile his claims in a separate action when he is prepared to comply with the noted conditions. Pulling was one of several plaintiffs who filed the action. This opinion and accompanying Order are directed only to Pulling. 1 Dockets.Justia.com The clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to Pulling. ENTERED this 29th day of September, 2020. ________________________________ HON. THOMAS T. CULLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
