Mitchell-Haynes v. Clarke et al, No. 7:2020cv00381 - Document 5 (W.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/31/2020. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mitchell-Haynes v. Clarke et al Case 7:20-cv-00381-MFU-RSB Document 5 Filed 07/31/20 Page 1 of 1 Pageid#: 12 Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION DEANGELO ALFONSO MITCHELL-HAYNES, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD CLARKE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:20cv00381 MEMORANDUM OPINION By: Michael F. Urbanski Chief United States District Judge Plaintiff DeAngelo Alfonso Mitchell-Haynes, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By conditional filing order entered July 2, 2020, the court assessed a filing fee and directed plaintiff to submit certain financial documentation within twenty days. The court advised plaintiff that failure to return the required paperwork would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. More than twenty days have elapsed, and Mitchell-Haynes has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, the court will dismiss Mitchell-Haynes’ complaint without prejudice. Mitchell-Haynes is advised that the claims raised in this action may be refiled in a separate action, subject to the applicable statute of limitations. 31stday of July, 2020. ENTER: This ____ Mike Urbanski cn=Mike Urbanski, o=US Courts, ou=Western District of Virginia, email=mikeu@vawd.uscourts.gov, c=US 2020.07.31 10:52:25 -04'00' ____________________________________ Michael F. Urbanski Chief United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
