Baker v. Gilmore, et al, No. 7:2018cv00382 - Document 156 (W.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 11/30/2020. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Baker v. Gilmore, et al Case 7:18-cv-00382-TTC-RSB Document 156 Filed 11/30/20 Page 1 of 1 Pageid#: 1080 Doc. 156 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION DEWAYNE BAKER, Plaintiff, v. IVAN GILMORE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:18cv00382 MEMORANDUM OPINION By: Hon. Thomas T. Cullen United States District Judge Plaintiff DeWayne Baker, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order entered November 2, 2020, the court granted Baker a final extension of time to file an amended complaint, after more than a year of granting him extensions. (See ECF No. 153.) The court warned Baker that no further extensions would be granted and that if he failed to file an amended complaint within 21 days, the court would dismiss this action without prejudice. (Id.) More than 21 days have elapsed, and Baker has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s order. The court notes that this dismissal is without prejudice to Baker’s opportunity to refile his claims in a separate civil action, subject to the applicable statute of limitations. ENTERED this 30th day of November, 2020. __/s/ Thomas T. Cullen______________ HON. THOMAS T. CULLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
