Harris v. Fleming et al, No. 7:2018cv00201 - Document 11 (W.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 06/27/2018. (aab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL SOFFI U.S. ST. ERK' CE DI OURT N RM NOKE VA C , FI LED J 2? 2 1 U8 23 I THE UYI STATESDI TRI COURT N TED S CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DISTRI OF W RGI A CT NI ROANOK E DI SI W ON J UL C. LEX CLERK D B: j Y , DEPUTY CL ERM CH A RLE S M .H AR R I S, Pl ntf ai if, Ci lAi i No.7: c 00201 vi ton 18- v- M EMORANDUM OPI ON N V. L.FLEM I G ,e al N t , By: M i hae F.U r c l bansd l Chi fU ni e St e D i t i tJudge e t d at s s r c Dee n t) fnda ts. Cha l sM . ni , oc edi pr K ,fl d aci lrght c re Ha s pr e ng o ie vi i s ompli ,purua t 42 U. C. ant s nt o S. j1 3.ByOr e e tr do M a 4, 01 ,h c ur dr ce pl tf t s b ta imae 98 d r n ee n y 2 8 t e o t ie td in if o u mi n n t a ountf r ,a a c rii d c ofpl i ifstus f nd a ol tsa e e f t .i mont cc o m nd e tfe opy antf r t u cc m tt m nt or hesxh pe i i me ae ypr ce ng t flng oft c rod m di tl e di he ii he ompl i ,obti d fom t a o i t pzs ant a ne ' he ppr prae i on r ofi a ofe chprs a wli h pl ntf i o wasco i d durngt tsxfcil a ion t lc ai if s r nfne i ha i mont pe i wihi h rod t n 20 da fom t da eoft Or r ai iffld r t ne ac oft i ae a c ys ' he t r he de .Pl ntf ie eur d opy he nm t c ountr por e t sgned byt tts ofk erbutdi no i udet r quie sxi he rzt t d t ncl he e r d i mont sa e e s h t tm nt . By a s ond Or re e ed b M ay 30,201 t cou te anedt tpli ifdi no ec de nt r n 8, he r xpl i ha antf d t r t m t r quie sxe u he e r d i mont sa e nt a gr nt dpli ifzo daysfom t dat oft Or r h t t me s nd a e antf r he e he de t c o ompl Pli ifwa ad s dt taf llet c y. antf s vi e ha aitr o ompl w ozd r s ti dimis lo tlsa ton y ll e ul n s s a f li c i wih u p eu ie t o t rj d c . M or t n 20 da ha elps d,andpli ifhasf l t c e ha ys ve a e antf aied o ompl wih t de c i d y t he s rbe c n iin .Ac o dngy t c u t imis st ea to wih u p eu iea dsrk stec s o dto s c r i l,he o r ds s e h cin t o t rj dc n ti e h a e Harris v. Fleming et al Doc. 11 f o t a tve doc toft co t Pl i ifm a r f l t c a m si a s pa a e ac i n o e r m he c i ke he ur . a ntf y e ie he l i n e r t to nc pl i tf i pr pa e t c pl w ih t not d c tons a n if s e r d o om y t he e ondii . Dockets.Justia.com The Clr i die t t s nd ac oft sM e o a e k s r ced o e opy hi m r ndum Opi on a a ompa ng ni nd cc nyi Or rt pl i if de o antf. E E Ti W V NT R: hs ' dyo Jme2 1. a ft , 0 8 . , #f 'J dmr . r H f ! ' ? ' '' t ifUntdS ae '' l e ie tt t t' ' * W' 2 ' 't u g ' ' . cJd e '
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
