Brown v. Quintana, No. 7:2017cv00451 - Document 9 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 12/12/2017. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK' oFFl u. Djm couRT : cq s, s . AT nANvI E, Lk vA FI UED I TH E UN I D STATE S D I N TE STR I C O U R T CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F V I G I A CT R NI R O A N O K E DI I O N V SI BE2 12 2 1 C? u C. DLEM CL RK D B: W Y CH R I STO PH E R LA M O N TE BR O W N DE I CL R PU Y E , Pe i i r, t tone Ci lA c i n N o.7: c 00451 vi t o 17- vM EM O M ND U M O PI O N M F.QUI NTANA, By: Re ponde . s nt H on.Jackson L.K i ser Se or U ni e St t D i t i tJudge ni t d a es s r c Chrs ophe La ont Br n,a f de a i a e pr e ng pr K ,fl d a pe ii f a i t r m e ow e r l nm t oc edi o ie tton or . wrtofha sc puspl s ntt 28U. C.j2241.Peii rha be nc ce i t M i e i bea or z ua o r S. ttone d e onvitd n he ddl D it i tofLoui i f c pi i t pos e s wih t i e t dit i e c i pos e s ng a s rc sana or ons r ng o s s t he nt nt o s rbut oca ne, s s i tr a m i f r he a e ofa d ug t a f c ng c i e a pos e s ng a ûr a a a c i e r n u t r nc r r f i ki rm , nd s s i e nn s onvi t d f on. c e el Uni dSae v. o , . :3 1 6 S SCR- ( . La J n 4, 1 ) Pei o rag e t tts Br wn No 3 1 - 4 - DD- 1 M D. . u e 20 4 . tt ne r u s e i t thi i a c r to i unc tt tonalbec us he i ac u ly i ha s nc r e a i n s ons iu i a e s t a l nnoce oft s c i e , he nt he e rm s t e de e w asi uf i i ntt s t n t m ,a he ha i f e tve c vi nc ns f c e o us ai he nd d ne f c i ouns l Pe ii ri pr s nty e . ttone s e e l c i d a ac r to lf iiy wihi t sditi t andt sma tri be or m ef pr lmi r onfne t orec ina ac lt t n hi src , hi te s f e or e i na y rviw p rua t oRuls1b > d4o teRulsGo r ig j2 5 Ca e . Afe r ve ng e e us n t e () n fh e venn 2 4 s s1 tr e iwi Pe ii rss isons 1co l t tPe ii rf ist de o tae a e ilm e t r le ttone ' ubm s i , ncude ha ttone a l o m nsr t n ntte nt o e if v aj2 41 a dld s s t p tto wih u p eu ie i 2 , n imis he ei n t o t rj dc . i A dititco tmayno e eti aj2241peiin atmptngt i ldaeac cin src ur t ntran tto te i o nvai t onvito u ls amoinpu s a t oj2 5i Sn d q aeo i efciet t s t elg lt o gn n e s to ru n t 25 s t a e u t r n fe tv o et h e ai f a i y Brown v. Quintana Doc. 9 i t ')d tnin. 2 U. C. 2 5 ( S i v. e se 4 U. 3 2 3 ( 9 7 . nmaes ee to ' 8 S. j 2 5 $; wan Pr sly, 30 S. 7 , 81 1 7 ) ' pr e a i di ntt j2255r le,s h a t saut oflmiainsort r eagans oc durl mpe me o eif uc s he tt e i tto he ul i t s e svepeii , no rnde j2255r viw tna quae' çnefe tve. l r Vil ucc s i ttons does t e r e e t de t'or ' fci ' n e a, i i ' l l 1b p r t ac u toa pl teRulsfrj2 5 Cae t aj2 41h b a p tto , n Rue4p r t a Rue () emi o r t p y h e o 2 4 ss o 2 a e s ei n a d l emi s i s c 't dim isahabe peii when ipl nl a ar t tapeiineri no en ildt r le. our o s s t as tton t ai y ppe s ha tto s t tte o eif Dockets.Justia.com . 1 5F.d 1 9 ,1 9 n. (t Ci. 9 7 .Th UntdS ae Co t fAp e l f rt eFo rh 1 3 1 2 1 4 5 4h r 1 9 ) e ie tts ur o p as o h u t Cic i h sf u dta j2 5 i ia e u t a die fciet ts t lg l yo ac n ito rut a o n h t 2 5 s n d q ae n n fe tv o e the e ai f o v cin t onl whe a prs rs ts sat ee pa tsa r y n ione a ife hr - r t nda d: ( )g tt etme o c n ito s tld lw o ti cru to t e S p e Co r 1 Aq h i f o v ci n et a f h s ic i r h u rme u t e etbihe t elg lt o tec n cin ( )s bsq e tt t prs n rsdrc sa ls d h e aiy f h o vito ; 2 u e u n o he io e ' ie t a p a a d frt j2 5 mo in t e s b tn ie 1w c n e s h t a t p e l n s 25 to , h u sa tv a ha g d uc h t he c onduc ofwhi h t prs rwa c ce i de med nott be c i na ;a t c he ionr s onvi td s e o rmi l nd ()tep io e c n ts tsy teg tk e n p o iin o j22 5be a s t 3 h rs n r a no aif h ae e pig r vso s f 5 c u e he ne r ei noto ofc tt i ll w. w ul s ne onsiutona a l r J n s 2 6F.d3 , 3 - 4(t Ci. 0 0 . n e o e , 2 3 28 3 3 3 4h r 2 0 ) Peiin rma n tc le eh sc n cin vi j2 41 Pei o e fist e p anho a tto e y o halng i o vito s a 2 . tt n r al o x li w i c ng i s t ntve l w m a i l ga t c pie t pos e sw ih t i e t di t t ha e n ubs a i a de t e l o ons r o s s t he nt nt o sdbu e c i pos e safr ar i f t r nceofa d ug ta fc ng c i e orpos e afr r a a ocane, s s ie m n urhe a r r f iki rm , s s ien m s c ce fl Thefc t tane j2255moi wo dbetmebardorc i rd onvitd eon. a t ha w ton ul i re onsdee s c svedoesno ma j2255rviw ti deq t'o ti fe tve. Ac or ngy, ttone uc esi t ke e e çna uae' r lnef ci ' c di l Peii r ' fist mee t l r J ssa r t s w t tj2255i i q t ori fci t ts t al o t he n e one tnda d o ho ha s nade uae nefe tve o e the l lt ofhi c cins hi camsc l bea e s dunde j2241, ndt peii mus be egaiy s onvito , s li amot ddrs e r a he tton t dim is d wiho prl die.2 s s e t ut e' c u ENTER:Th s s hd yo De e e , 2017. i T a f c mb r Se rUnied St t D i ti tJ n' t a es sr c udge 21d ciet c ntu peio e ' j2 41p tt na aj2 5 moin.Fis aj2 5 moinmu t efldwi e l o o sr e tin rs 2 eii s 2 5 to rt n t o 2 5 to s b ie t h tec u't ti sdt s ne c .28U. C. 2 5 ( S c n , eio e ara ytldaj2 5 moint h o l ha mpo e he e tn e t S. j 2 5$. e o d P tt n r le d ie i 2 5 to o c leg hscn it n.Co sqe t Ptto e mutrc iepefln atoiainfo teapo raecu' haln e i o vci s neu nl ei nr s eev r-i j uhrzto rm h p rpit ol o y, i i t o a pe lt 5l as c esv j2 5 moin.2 U. C. 2 5 ($. Peio e h sn td mo tae ta ac u t f f p as o e u c sie 2 5 to 8 S. j 2 5 1 tln r a o e nsrtd h t o r o t a e l h sa t rz dh m t s b t s c n o s c e sv j2 5mo i n a d ta fn' gac e ry s c e sv pp a s a uho ie i o u mi a e o d r u c s i e 25 to , n rnse i n la l u c s ie j2 5 moint tesne cngc ut o sn t'rhe teitrsso j sieo j iil c n my 2 5 to o h e tn i o r d e o f t r h neet f utc rudca e o o . u 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
