Ball v. Wilmer, No. 7:2017cv00366 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 8/29/2017. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
cl Rx' oF lius Dlmr - l - s Fc E s n ' I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTER N D I STR I O F W R G I I CT N A R O AN O K E D I I O N V SI R EG I ALD K EI B ALL, N TH Pl nt f , ai i f a ,, T RoAsoxalvA . ji gl :( . ' i ALC 22 2 1 รป? J Z . D UUI ' ' : BY; C i lA c i N o.7: 7- v- 366 vi t on 1 c 00 M EM O M ND U M O PI O N NI By: G l E.C onr en ad Uni e St e D i t i Judge t d at s s r ct JI M Y W I ER , M LM De e a t) f nd nts. Regi l Keih Bal, oc e ng pr K ,fl aci lrgh sc na d t l pr e di o ied vi i t ompli , zs ntt 42 ant ptr ua o . U. C. 1 8 .Byo d re trdAu s 7 2 7 t c u t ie tdpan ift s b t t n2 S. j 9 3 r e n ee gut , 01 ,he o r drce litf o u mi wi 0 hi da fom t da eoft or rt sgne cons n t wihhol ng offlngf e f m i o de t ys r he t he de he i d e t o t di ii e s or n r r o c eet a iai t pr e j f mapa ds OnAug t21 201 t o de a omplt he pplc ton o oc ed n or upe . us , 7 he r r nd pl a ngwe er tz e a t lve a ewih nof wa di a es .Pli tf wa a s t ta e di r e t d s mde i r bl t m or r ng ddr s a n if s dvied ha f ilet c mpl wo l rs l i d s sa o t i a to wih u p eu ie alr o o y ud e ut n imis l f h s cin t o t rj dc . t M or t n 20 da ha ea ed,a pl ntf sf ie t co pl wiht de c l d e ha ys ve lps nd ai ifha al d o m y t he s rbe c ndto .Ac o dn l, h c u t imis stea to wi o t rj d c a srk stec s o iins c r igy t e o r ds se h ci n t u p eu ie nd ti e h a e h fom t a tve doc toft c t Pl ntf a r iet cli i as pa ae a ton onc ' he c i r ke he our. ai ifm y efl he a ms n e r t c i e pl i ifi pr pa ed t c pl w ih t not d c tons a ntf s e r o om y t he e ondii . TheClr i die t d t s nd ac oft sM e or ndlm Opilon a ac ompa ng ek s rce o e opy hi m a l ri nd c nyi Or rt pl i if de o antf . ENTER:Ths X0 i Ball v. Wilmer d yo Aug t2 7 a f us, 01 . Doc. 7 U nie St t s Di t i tJ t d a e s rc udge Dockets.Justia.com .' '. , O f. ,
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
