Meyers v. Director of the Patent and Trademark Office, No. 7:2017cv00233 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 6/29/2017. (tvt)

Download PDF
CL K' OF I U.. 8 P@. ER S FCE : DII - . M :rRC.NtKE, . A ) . VA : . . FE LED I TH E U NI N TED STATES DISTR I C O UR T CT FO R TI W ESTERN DI TE STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A ROANOK E DW I ON SI JUN 2q 2 1 27 JULi G A BY: Ci lA c i N o.7: c 00233 vi t on 17- v- DAW D M EYER S, Pl nt f , ai i f M EM ORANDUM OPI ON NI V. By: G l n E .Conr e ad C hi fU ni e St t sD i t i tJudge e td a e src DI RECTOR OF THE PATENT AND TRADEM ARK OFFICE, Dee a t) fnd nts. Da d M e r ,pr ee ngpr K,fl a cvi dg sc vi ye s oc di o ied i l ht ompl i , ls ntt 28U. C. am ptr ua o S. . 91 61Peiinf rW rt fM a d mu .Byo d re tr dJ n 6 2 7 t c u'dr ce panif 3 t o o io n n s t r e ne e u e , 01 ,he o z ie td li tf t t s i wihi 20 da fom t dat o t or ra sa e ntofa s t ,a i ae a comt o ubm t t n ys r he e f he de t t me s es n nm t c l f onn,a a c ri c ofpl ntf tus fmd a comtsa e e f t sxnd e tfed opy ni ifs r t l c l tt m nt or he i mont pei h lod i e aey pr c i t flng oft co pl nt obt i fom t a o it pds ofi i mm dit l e ed ng he ii he m ai , aned r he ppr pra e on fcal ofe c prs n a whih pli ifi orwasc i d durngt tsx- ont pei a wel asa a h io t c antf s onfne i ha i m h lod s l n e c e ve ii d satm e f r .Pli ifwasa s t taf iur t c xe ut d rfe t e nt o m antf dvied ha a l e o ompl woul r s ti y d e ul n ds sa o t i a to wih u p eudc . imisl f hs cin t o t rj ie M o et 20 da ha e a e a pli ifhasf l dt c r h% ys ve l ps d, nd antf aie o ompl wih t de c i d y t he s rbe c n iin .Ac o dngy t c u t imis st ea to wih u p eu iea dszke t ec s o dto s c r i l,he o r ds s e h cin t o t rj dc n ti s h ae fom t a tvbdoc toft co t Pli ifm a r fl t c am si as pa a eaci n o e r he c i ke he ur. nntf y e ie he l i n e r t to nc pl ntf spr pa e t co pl wiht not d c to . ai ifi e r d o m y t he e ondii ns Meyers v. Director of the Patent and Trademark Office TheClr i die t d t s nd ac o t sM e or ndlm Opi on a ac om pa ng ek s rce o e opy f hi m a l ni nd c nyi Doc. 3 Or rt pl i if de o antf. y -u 01 ENTER:TMs J9N da ofl ne, 2 7. Chi fUnied St t D i ti tJ e t a es s r c udge Dockets.Justia.com ' w , .

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.