Lanier v. Commonwealth of Virgina Department of Correction, No. 7:2017cv00224 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/11/2017. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK' OFFI U. . ST. S CE S DI COURT AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED I THE UNI STATESDI TRI COURT N TED S CT J 11 2 1 UL . 27 FO R TH E W ESTER N D I STR I O F VI G I A CT R NI ROANOKE DI SI VI ON % . v O W EN LEE LA NI , ER Pettone , ii r Ju U BY: .2 .. .t z ' . t , cue zv cu sak Ci lA c i n N d.7: c 00224 vi t o 17- v- M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI V. C O M M O NW EA LTH O F W R GI I N A DEPAR TG N T O F C O RR E CTI N , h O .v ', R espondent . : s By: ' on. ihae F.Ur H M c l bansd l Chi fU nied St e Di t c Judge e t at s s ri t t N. . ., . .. . .. q . . 'a. . . . : ' j y . j : . Peii n rOWe Le Lale, Vign aimaej o e dn P O, :4 e(aPejky/j awrt tto e n e lir a r ii n t r c e ig r . , . j t oj (. j > .q %s t 1 . ' . .x . x yK j . . j ofha a copusplrua t 28U. C.j2254.Byt Or f.ntr dop Ma 30,201 t c t be s r zs nt o S. he de e q e y 7, he our . . T * if r d Peiin r ta t e p tt n a p a e t i l a d ' x a se a d rq e td n o me tto e h t h eii p e r d mtmey n t l u t d n e u se o me h ' q î . $ i or to wihi t n da . The Or ra s d Pe ii rt ta f iur t r s nf mai n t n e ys de dvie ttone ha al e o é pond c d r s ti oul e ul n . .' j ds sa o teptin P tinrh sn t ep n e t teOre, n 'sth t alt dfr imisl fh eio . eio e a o rso dd o h dr adA v i l t o t t me o e î '! ., lsr s ns ha e pie , h sa to i ds s e wi o tp eudc f rf iigt ç mpl wiht l e po e s x rd t i cin s imis d t u rj ie o aln é.o y t he i h Or e. S eBalr v. rs n 8 2F.d9 ,9 (t Ci.1 8 )(ttn p o# ltg nsaes b e t d r e lad Ca lo , 8 2 3 6 4 h r 9 9 sai g r . ii a t r u j c : t tm er quie t a r pec f co tor r a dim is li a a o t s né i f nono i e r men s nd es t or ur de s nd s s a s n ppr pdae a ton or ' . l c mpl nc ) s e as Do nel v.J l - a vle Sae Co ,6 7 F.d 3 9 3 0 k1 ( d Ci. o i e ; e lo n l a y omsM n il ls p. 7 2 3 , 4 - ' 3 r . 1 8 )(e o n zng adsdc c u tma s as n ed s s a a to p zs a tt Fe .R.Ci P. 9 2 rc g ii it t o r y u po t imis n cin t u n o d r v. 41b ) Ba e u n t e c u tsfn ig t tpeiin r h s n tma e te rq ii s bsa ta ( ). s d po h o r' i dn ha t o e a o d h e u st u tn il t e s o n o a d n a o a c nsiuin lrg ta r q ie b 2 U. C.j2 3c a d S a k v. h wig f e il f o t to a ih s e urd y 8 S. t 25 4) n lc Lanier v. Commonwealth of Virgina Department of Correction Doc. 7 M c ni ,5 U. 473, 4 ( Da el 29 S. 48 2000) ac rii t ofa lbiiyi de e Thepeiin ma be , e tfcae ppeaa lt s nid. tto y rfldi an w a ds paa eie n e n e rt E E Ti ( NT R: hs 'ns b e tt 28U. C. 2 4 d () u jc o S. j 2 4()1 . dyoJl,07 a fuy21. / +/ 4 2.. . - ee / # -, ' - z, Chi U nie St t s D it 'tJ ef t d a e s udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
