Shumake v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 7:2017cv00214 - Document 14 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/30/2017. (slt)

Download PDF
ctEe s OFFI U.s, DI COURT CE ST. AT RM NOKE, VA FI LED J 2 12 1 UN 27 I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTER N D I STR I O F W R G I I CT N A ROANOKE DI SI VI ON J BY: DARYLL KEI SH UM AKE, TH Pl nt f , ai i f C i lA c i N o.7: 7- v- 214 vi t on 1 c 00 V. M EM ORANDUM OPI O N NI COM M ONW EALTH OF W RGI NIA, D e endant f . By: U LE CLERK M ' H o M i hae F. n. c l Urbans ki U nied St esD i t i tJudge t at src Dar lKe t Shtma ,aVigi ai aepr e ng nr K ,Gld am oto f a yl ih l ke r ni nm t oc edi o e i n or . p ei n r ijmcin i ti cvla to fldp ru n t 4 U.. j1 8 a an tte r l a y nl to n h s ii cin ie u s a t o 2 SC. 9 3 g i s h mi Co n at o Vig na A mo n mus etbihf t ee nsb f r ap ei n r mmo we 1 f r i i. h va i t sa ls ol lme t eo e rlmiay r ijmcinma is e 1 hei lk l t s c e do t emeis 2 hei l l t s fe irp r be nt to y su : ) s iey o u c e n h rt; ) s i y o u fr re a a l ke h nni t ea s n eo p ei nayr le; )t baa c o e ute t i hi fv r a 4 a n n h b e c f r lmi r eif 3 he ln e f q iis i n s a o ; nd ) n ps ij n to i i tep lci tr s.W itrv. tr l s De. t i. n .5 5U. 7 2 nu cin s n h ubi ne et n e Nau a Re . f ComclI c, 5 S. , 0 (0 8. 20) Pli iff l t e t bls t thei lkey t s e d oït m e isofhi cli be a e antf ais o sa ih ha s i l o ucc e r he rt s a ms c us hef ist nn eapr pe de e nt Se e. ,W ilv. ihi n De to St t Po ie,491U . al o m o r f nda . es g. l M c aa p' f ae lc S. 5 , 0( 9 9 (ttn sae aeno pes n frp r os so j1 3 .Ac o dn l, anif al 8 7 1 8 ) sai g tts r t ro s o u p e f 98 ) c r igy Plitf f is t s tsyt eee n sf rap ei n r ij n to a h smoinf rap ei nayijmcin o aif h lme t o r l ay nu cin, nd i to o rlmi r nt to mi m us bede ed. t ni * E ER:hs'b dyoMa, 07 NT Ti3 a f y2 1. Shumake v. Commonwealth of Virginia Doc. 14 # 'rz' w ' y . ' . ' ' . Unie St t sDititJ t d a e src udge Dockets.Justia.com ry ZJ

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.