Meyers v. Clarke et al, No. 7:2017cv00201 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 6/1/2017. (tvt)

Download PDF
D porsoe l L. nl ccE !s. sm A R FNOKE V . T P I ,A LED I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A R O A NO K E D I SI N W O D A VI M EY ER S, D Pl ntf , ai i f J 21 2 1 UN 27 JUL . I D BY; ' , c C i lA c i N o.7: 7- v- 201 vi t on 1 c 00 M EM O M NDUM OPI O N NI D I CTO R H AR O LD CL AR K E,e al RE t , By: G l n E .Conr e ad C hi fU ni e St esD i t i tJudge e t d at src De e a t) fnd nts. Davi M e r,pr ee ngpr K ,iedacvirg sc antpurua t 42U. C.j d yes oc di o fl i l iht ompli s nt o S. 1 983. By o de e e e M a 8, 7,hec tdie t pl i ift s i wihi 20 da fom r r nt r d y 201 t our r c ed antf o ubm t t n ys r t da eoft or rasaeme ofa s s a i a ea ot f m ,a ace tfedco of he t he de t t nt s et, n nm t cc mt or nd rii py pli i stus fmd a co sa e ntf t sx- ont pe i i med a ey pr e ngt flng antY r t t c unt t t me or he i m h rod m i t l ec di he i oft co pl nt obt i fo t a opraeprs n ofi i lofea h prs a whih pli ifi he m ai , aned r m he ppr i t io fc a c ion t c antf s o wasco i d durngt tsxr nfne i ha i mont pe i aswe la t ve i d sa e e f m .Pl i if h rod, l s he rfe t t m nt or antf wa a vie t a af ilet c mpl wo l rs l i d s sa o t i a to wih u p eu ie s d s d h t alr o o y u d e ut n imis l f h s cin t o t 'j d c . t r M or t n 20 da ha elps d,a pl i ifha f ld t c e ha ys ve a e nd antf aie o ompl wih t des rbe y t he c i d c n iin .Ac o dngy tec u t imis st a to wih u p eu iea dsrke t c s o dto s c r i l ,h o r d s se he cin t o t rj dc n ti s he ae fo t a tve d ke oft c t antf may r ûl t c am si as pa a eaci n onc r m he c i oc t he our.Pli if e e he l i n e r t to e pl i ifi pr pa e t c antf s e r d o ompl wih t not c tons y t he ed ondii . The Clr i die t t s nd aco oft sM e o a e k s r ced o e py hi m r ndum Opi on a a om pa ng ni nd cc nyi Or rt pl ntf. de o ai if Meyers v. Clarke et al Doc. 4 EN TER : Thi s t r ( M ' da ofJ ,201 y une 7. ChifU .t d St t sDititJ e -e a e src udge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.