Langrel v. SWVRJA-Duffield et al, No. 7:2016cv00593 - Document 22 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 6/5/2017. (slt)

Download PDF
CL S OFFI U. . ST. ERK' CE S DI COURT AT RG NOKE, VA FIED L I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF W R GI A CT NI R OANOKE DI SI W ON J รป5 2 1 UN 27 JU D EY CLERK BY: D A W D A LA N LAN GR EL, Pl ntf , ai i f C i lA c i N o.7: 6- vvi ton 1 c 0059 3 V. M EM ORANDUM OPI ON NI SW VRJADUFFI ELD,e al, t . De e f ndant . s By: . W CL H o M i hae F. n. c l Urbansd l U ni e St esD i t i tJudge t d at src Da d Aln La e , oc edi pr K ,fl acvi rght co pl ntpur ua t 42 vi a ngr l pr e ng o ied i l i s m ai s nt o U.. j1 3whl ic reae ByisOr e e tr do De e e 2 , 01 ,h c u t d ie SC. 98 ie n ac rtd. t d r n ee n c mb r 2 2 6 t e o r a v sd pli ift ta f iur t upda eam alng a es a tratanje o r ea e fom i a ce a in antf ha al e o t ii ddr s fe r f r r el s r nc r r to wilr ul i dim is oft sa to l es t n s s al hi ci n. Theco tsm alt pl i ifha r t r asundei r e,a pli ifha no c aced ur' i o antf s e u ned lve abl nd a ntf s t ont t t c ur snc J nua y 201 Pli tf hasf ie t c he o t i e a r 7. a n if a ld o ompl wih t co ltsOr rr qui a y t he tr ' de e dng n a c la ema lngad e s a t r f e, heco tsndst tpli iff l t pr e ut t s c tr t ii dr s , nd he e or t ur ha antf aied o os c e hi a to p rua t oFe ea Rul o Cii Pr c d r 41b .Ac o dn l,hec u t imis st e cin u s n t d r l e f v l o e u e 4) c r igy t o r ds s e h c mp an wi o t rj dc a dd n e a1 e dn moin a mo t S eBalr v. rs n, o lit t u p eu ie n e is 1 p n ig to s s o . e lad Calo h 8 2F.d9 9 (t Ci. 98 )(ttn p oK l ia t a es b e tt tmerq ie n sa l 8 2 3, 6 4 h r 1 9 saig r i g n s r u j c o i e urme t nl t r s c f rc u t r e sa dds sa i a a p o raes n to f rn n c mpl nc ) s eas e pe t o o r o d r n imis l s n p rp it a cin o o -o i e; e lo a Domel v. omsMa vi eSae Co .6 7F.d1 9 3 - ( dCi.1 8 )(e og iiga l l J l - n l ls p , 7 2 3 , 4041 3 r 9 2 r c n zn y l dsrc c u t ys as o t d s s a a to p ru n t Fe . Ci P. ( ). itit o r ma u p n e imis n cin u s a t o d R. v. 41b) ..* . .' Langrel v. SWVRJA-Duffield et al ENTER: i O Th s Doc. 22 - d yo Jme 2 7. a f t , 01 / / * 4xmu /.W I 4A #' r - ' . Unie Stt sDititJ ge t d a e src Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.