Renoir v. Sykes et al, No. 7:2016cv00378 - Document 5 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 9/27/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERKS OFFI U.. DIE COURT CE S S AT RCANOKE, I I VA iC lLED I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTE RN DI STRI T O F W R G I I C N A R OA N O K E D I SI N W O PI R E A .REN O I , ER R SE/ 22 2 1 2 25 J A ?.'- ;ï j.I ULi z ''D z œ-ERK 7 Y BY; , ' CA SE N O .7: 6CV 00378 1 Pl ntf , ai if V. M EM O RA ND UM O PI O N NI S UPERVI SOR SYKES, AL. c , By: G l n E .Conr e ad C hi fU ni e St esD i t i tJudge e t d at src D ef endant . Pi r e A .Re r a V igi a i a e pr e di pr > ,fl d t s a ton t de 42 U . C. er noi , r ni nm t oc e ng o q i e hi c i m r S. . . j l 8 a ans u a d a miitao so t eVignaDe rme to Co rcin ( 9 3 g i t mzme d n srtr f h r ii pat n f n to s VDOC)a d n ofi i l a t ee VD OC pr s ,ls i va i us a ve s ,pas e nt he ha a l ge y e r e ed f c a s t hr i ons i tng r o d r e t ve s s le dl xpe i nc i prs Bec us Re rha no pr pai t r qui ieflngf e t c ta sz f pur e n ion. a e noi s t e d he e st ii e , he our s lmes or pos s oft so ni t thei s e ngt pr e Llf r pa rs Uponr viw oft rc d,t hi pi on ha s e ki o oc ed r o ma upei. e e he e or he c u tfn st a t e a t n mu tbe s mmaiy ds s e wih u p eu ieba e o Re i' o r id h t h ci o s u rl imis d t o t rj dc s d n nors m a pr o c vi a tonst tha be n di m i s ny i r i l c i ha ve e s s ed. The Prs Lii ton Ref r Ac of 1 s t taly n nded t i f r a pa rs ion tga i om t 995 ubsan i l me he n o m upe i sau e 2 U. C.j 1 5 Th p r s o t Ac wa t r q ie alp io e ltg ns s i ttt, 8 S. 91 . e upo e f he t s o e ur l rs n r i a t ung i g r nte ii s orof a st pa flng f s i 1 1,et rtzo h pr pa e ort o h ove nme ntte fcil o y i ee n 1 ihe lr ug e ym nt hr ug isal nt wih ed fo t e l ia ts i mae tu ta c t . j 1 5b . Se to 1 5 g n tlme s t h l r m h i g n ' n t r s c omt t 91 () cin 91 ( ) de es t i t lm e pa m e m e hod t pr s r who ha çt ee sr kes'- t e prs r ni he ns a l nt y nt t o i one s ve çhr t i ' hos i one s Renoir v. Sykes et al w ho ha ha t ee pr vi ca e or a al di m i s a f i ous m a i i ,orf f itr t ve d hr e ous s s ppe s s s ed s r vol , lc ous or a lle o Doc. 5 saeacam, ne stetre srk ri maes o çmmie td n e o sro sp ysc lij r ' tt li u ls h h e -tie n t h ws s n n a g r f ei u h ia nu y. i ' j1 g. 915() Dockets.Justia.com Re rha br ug s h a tons ora noi s o ht uc c i ppeas on t ee ormor proroc asons Se ec. l hr e i c i . e, . , Re orv. ven ro Vigni, 5 F. u p. d8 ( D. 2 0 ( imis dt e j 1 1 (); n i Go r o f r i a 7 5 S p 2 2 D. C. 01 ) ds s e md r 9 5 g) Re or v Da i s n No.0 -v 3 3 20 8 W L 2 4 8 3 t * ( D.W ic 2 08 (o ig n i . vdo , 8c -3 , 0 9 4 9 ,a 1 E. s . 0 ) n tn a c muain o tr eC tie ' ;Re orv.Br wn, .0 CV00 6 ,2 0 W L 1 5 4 7 a *1 c u lto f h e ç rk s' n i s ) o No 7 16 07 027,t ( . Va 2 0 )(ç n i h sG r esrk s u d rj1 5 g .) Re i v Ra ,7:6 01 4 W D. . 0 7 l or a t e tie ' n e 91 ()' ; nor . y 0 CV0 6 , Re h ' 2 0 W L 8 31 ( . Va 2 0 )( imis du e j 1 5 g , t fn igt t l g to sas 06 40 3 W D. . 0 6 d s se nd r 91 ( ) wi i dn ha al ai n lo h e dd n tsaea y a to be j 1 8 cam) Re orv W is n Cii Acin No 7:9 0 1 i o tt n cina l 9 3 li ; n i . lo , v l to . 9 CV0 8 0 ( . Va.1 ( s se asfi ous. Ac r ngl Re rma pr ee L f mapa rs W D. 999) dimis d rvol ) co di y, noi y oc d q or upei ( t o tp e a me to t fln f e o l i h c n s o ta h fc si n n d ng ro wih u rp y n f he iig e ) ny f e a h w h t e a e mmie t a e f sro p y ia ij r j1 1 ( ) eius h sc l nu y. 9 5g . Re rsal ga i i t c noi' le tons n he ompl i a ebre a concus y: ant r i f nd l or Co snow,PireA.Re o ,Pr Se s ti a j1 fra notlmie t me er nir o , ubmitng 983 o nd i td o, 2 s xua a s uls be tngs br n bone de e t e t e a l i r N orh, e l s a t , a i , oke s ni d r a m nt t k ve t dg snzton ofpes lpr ry,dglt cin o hol boo ,dgjt ci of ejt ci rona opet e snlto f y ks e snzton lg l rpe t d esr cina dd nil fmal glg la drg lrmald nilo e a p o ry, gltu to n e a o ii e a n e u a i, e a f n f ood, 24- s e p de i ton, pur ef l c n i t o o f 7 le pr va i pos u ont m na i n f ood, a is m ii nt- e tc a e durng hol days t e t a i i dai n f a tm ptng t s e lga bus s i y , hr a s nd ntmi to or te i o e k e l r dr s ,t t e a a es t t c tt e c ue a un ua puni hm e ,de al e e s orur s nd bus ha ons iut r l nd us l s nt ni of due pr s f 1 i nt d i tt i l c r t r t it PREA r pors oce s or 0 nve e nsiutona ha ges o ealae e t, de a ofduepr s giva epr d e ec,adna eag . nil oce s re nc oce ur , t. us m) ( mpl 1 ECF No.1) Re ras saest theçsi i dit tzea t lf 'hasnoac es Co . , . noi lo tt ha i n mme ae lr t o ie, i ' c s t a1w lb ay, n n e c u s la p itdt a ss hm i t scvla to (d. Thsls o o a irr a d e ds o n e p on e o sit i n hi i i cin. I ) i it f p s,t ae e e t wih n idc to o ij re s fee o lk l t o c r i smpl a t md td v n s t o n iain f n u is u frd r i ey o c u s i y i s fce tt s w ta Re orwa i i ne td n e o a y p ysc lij r r ltd t hi n uf in o ho h t n i s n mmi n a g r f n h ia n u y eae o s cl i s a t tm e he fl hi c pl i t a m t he i ied s om a n . 2 Be a s t er c r srfe tta Re orh sa la t l e G ti s'md rj 1 5 g a dh c u e h e o d elc h t n i a t e s tl e t rke 't e 91 () n e r s ha notde o taedt the i i i i ntda ro physc lhn m,t c tde e Re rt s m nsr t ha s n mm ne nge f i a r he our ni s noi he o p ru t t p o e d L f nn p u e i a d ds s e te c mplitwi u p eu iet e p o tni o r c e q o a a p rs n imis s h o an t t rj dc md r y ho j1 5( .Ana opraeor rwilis t sda 91 g) ppr it de l sue hi y. The Cl r i d r c e t s nd copi s oft sm e or nd opi on a ac om pa ng e k s ie t d o e e hi m a um ni nd c nyi or rt pl i if de o a ntf . ENTER:Thi 29# d yo Se tmb r 2 6. s a f pe e, 01 Chi fUnie St esDit tJ e t d at sdc udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
