Dotson v. Warden of KMCC, No. 7:2013cv00529 - Document 55 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 3/30/2017. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK:AT DA t.& DI 'GOURT DFFI J m , GE NVI E, LL VA RL ED I THE UXI N TED S TATES DI STRI COURT PT MA2 3û 2 7 2 FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A ROANOKE DI SI VI ON JULA I D CL BK D P LER K EW N TER R Y D O T SO N , Pett oner, ii C i lA cton N o. vi i Ci lA c i n N o.7: 3 - vvi t o 1 c 00529 V. M E M O M N D UM O PI I N N O W A RD EN O F K M CC , R e ponde . s nt By: H on. t on L.K i er Jacls s Se or U ni e St e D i t i tJudge ni t d at s s r c Ke n Te Doton,aVigi ai t pr ee ngpr K ,r e l tl d am o i of vi ny s r ni nma e oc di o ec nty ie ton ç rnscfa upon t c t' n cvi a ton 7: 3- vl i i r ud ext he our'i i l c i 1 c 00529. I t ta ton, had g a t d n ha c i I r ne r ponde ' m oton t dim isa dimi s d Peii ne ' pe ii f awrtofha asco pus es nts i o s s nd s s e tto rs tton or i be r fldpurua t 28U. C.j2254. e s nt o S. Thei t ntGe rnscfa tpo t c t' i doe no a lge de ecsi t nsa çxti i r ud i n he our'moton s t le f t n he r ol i n ofhi frtha a peii n a i tad a tc t lga iyofhi sae c i né es uto s is be s tto nd nse ta ks he e lt s t t rmi l j d me tb s do f cse si b f r h fldh sfrt b a p tto .Ac o dn l 1c n tu u g n a e n a t xitng e o e e ie i is ha e s ei n c r igy, o sr e i t i t ntm oton a a s c ors ce svepe ii f a w rtofha s c pus c le ng t he ns a i s e ond uc s i tton or i bea or ha l ngi he smesaec u tu me tar a yc alng di cvla to 7 1 -v 0 5 9. a tt o r j dg n le d h l e n i i cin :3 c - 0 2 e P ru n t 28U. C. 2 4 49, fd r l ititc u t yc n ie as c n o u sa t o S. j 2 4 1 a e e a d src o r ma o sd r e o d r s c e sv j22 4pei o o yu ns cfcc ri to fo aUntdSttsColt fAp as u c sie 5 tt n nl po pe ii ett in r m i ka ie ae t o pe l r t tcai si t s e ntpe ii n m e tc ran crt ra.Bec us Pe ii ne ha nots ha l m n he ubs que tto e e ti ie i a e tto r s ubmit ted a e de t theha ob a ne s h c rik ai fom t Cour ofAppe l f t Fo t ny vi nce ha s t i d uc e tt ton r he t a s or he m' h Cic i, mu tds s t epei o wih u p eu iea s c e sv .Ba e u nt efn igt a r ut I s imis h tt n t o t rj dc s u c s ie s d po h i dn h t i Dotson v. Warden of KMCC Doc. 55 Pe ii rha notm a t r ui ie s t ntals i ofa de alofa cons i tona r ghtas ttone s de he eq s t ubs a i how ng ni tm i l i rquie by28U. C.j2253()a Slc v. c nil529U. 473, 4 ( ) ac rii t e rd S. c nd a k M Da e, S. 48 2000 , e tfcae of a a a lt i de ed. ppe l biiy s ni EN TER : TI W ' e- da o M a c 201 y f r h, 7. I M N t I s .-v . e o U nie St t D it i J ni r t d a es s rct udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
