Talford v. Wolfe, No. 7:2013cv00525 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 12/5/2013. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ek : oFFl u. el eour eee :, em AT M NVI E, VA FI D L B I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STR I O F VI G I A CT R NI ROANOKE DI SI VI ON JER M A I E C.TA LFO RD , N Pett oner, ii V. JERRY ALLEN W OLFE, R es pondent . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) /) *. ? - J UL BK . UnL E CL ERK % Ci lA c i N o.7: 3- v- 525 vi t on 1 c 00 M EM OM NDVM OPI ON NI By: H o Jac on L.Kie n. ks sr Se or U nied St e D it i tJudge ni t at s s r c Jem a neC. lor fl d apeii n f ra wrtofha sc pus purua t 28U . C. r i Taf d ie tto o i bea or , s nt o S. j2 41 wh l aprtild tie a iigc mplto o ci na p o e d n si t eCic i 2 , ie era ean e watn o ein f rmi l r c e i g n h r ut Cour f t Ciy ofBrsol Pe ii rco pl ne i t pe ii t tt sae c thadno t or he t it . ttone m ai d n he tton ha he t t our t c n e e ap etilb n h a igf rhm,h saej d ei ine o f' nt p n i ci n l o v n d r -ra o d e rn o i te tt u g t g d f'o he e dng rmi a s c r es t t ha g , he s tda e 'ke psbe ng pos pone a t s a e co tc e k who ha a e st cour t ' e i t d, nd he t t ur l r d cc s o e denc had asr a be me dia ed. Si e flngt sa ton,Pe ii rha pl de guit vi e toke nd cn s bl nc ii hi c i ttone s ea d ly t t c i i c r sa hasbee s ntnc d,Com monwe t v. lor No.c 1 o he rm nal ha ge nd n e e e a1h Taf d, r 300081 017- 03( Ci. . v. 201 ,a hei a ai t t Cour o AppeasofVigi a Taf d Va. r CtNo 4, 3) nd s ppe lng o he tf l r ni, lor v Co n at , .1 9 - 3 3( . p. . . 2, 01 ) . mmo we lh No 4 2 1 - Va Ap Ct Aug 1 2 3 . Abs e r or na y cr sa e ,whih ar notpr enti t sc e,1m a not ent xta di r icum t nc s c e es n hi as y i e f r wih on- ng sae c i i pr e ngs Se .e. ,Youl rv.Ha rs 401U . 37,44 nt re e t goi t t rm nal oc edi . e g. me ri , S. ( 9 ) F temo e Pei o e ' camsa o tap etilb n he rnga dp sp n d c u t ae 1 71 . urh r r , tt n rs li b u r-ra o d ai n o to e o r d ts i a em oot and Pettone s d fr tpr e a f der li s arsng fom t sa epr ee ngs r , ii r houl s es nt ny e a s ue ii r he tt oc di t t Supr m e Cour ofV igi a. A cc di y, he pe ii f a w rtofha asc usi o he e t r ni or ngl t tton or i be op s ds se wih u p eu iea d ac riiaeo a p aa iiyi d ne . imisd t o t rj dc n e t c t f p e lb l s e id f t ENTER:Thi -- day ofDec m be ,201 e r 3. 5 S ni nie St t Diti tJ or t d aes src udge (
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
