Hairston v. Brunswick Women's Reception & Pre-Release Center, No. 7:2013cv00471 - Document 5 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 10/24/2013. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK' OFFI US.BI S OE SXCOUA u r -: , . . ( , . r, .: y r (E - . .' . ;l vA , . :. j . j I TH E U N I D STATE S D I N TE STR I C O U RT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STR I T O F VI G I I C R N A R O AN O K E DIVISIO N STEVA M ARCHELLE HAI RSTON, Peii r ttone , ) ) ) v. ) ) BRUNSW I W OM EN' RECEPTI ) CK S ON AND PRERELEASE CENTER, ) Re ponde . s nt ) 0:- 2 # 2 1 1 r 23 f.(d kl7. ' .' : tp.: :. . .: : . k BY; DEPUW C Ci lA c i N o.7: c 00471 vi t on 13- v- M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI By: Sam ue G . is l W l on Unied St e D i t c Judge t at s s ri t Pe ii r Stva M a c l Ha rt a Vigi a i ae pr e ng pr s fl d t s ttone e r hele ison, r ni nm t oce di o e, ie hi peii f wrtofha a c pusptrua t 28U. C.j2254,c lngi he 2011a 201 tton or i be s or ts nt o S. hale ng r nd 2 convitonsi t Pityl ni Count Cicui Cour. Theco tfndst tHa rt hasno f ly c i n he ts va a y r t t ur i ha ison t' l u exha t d he sae c t r m e es bef r flng t s f der l habe s pe ii n a t r o e, use r t t our e di o e ii hi e a a tto nd, he ef r ds s e he peio wih u p eu ie imis s r tt n t o t rj dc . i 1. On N ove be 30,2011 t Pityl ni Co y Cic tCour c c e H a r t oft r m r , he ts va a unt r ui t onvi t d i son hid of n elre y,n vo ain o Va Co ej 1 .- 0 , n s ne e he t 5y a sic r eain fe s ac n i ilto f . d 82 1 4 a d e tnc d r o e r n ac rto , wih 3 ye s and 3 mont s pe d. On Dec m be 3,201 t c tr voke Har t s t ar hs us nde e r 2, he our e d ison' pr to on t lr eny c c i a s ntnc d he t s r e 6m ont ofa tvetme. Haison oba in he a c onviton nd e e e r o e v hs c i i rt ha no ye puruedhe c i nala a o fld anype ii n f rwrtofha sc pusi a sa e s t t s r rmi ppe l r ie tto o i bea or n ny t t c t Haison fl he f de alha as pe ii n o Se e r 20,201 i t Unie Stt our. rt ied r e r be tto n pt mbe 3 n he t d aes Di t i tCour f t Ea t r Di t i tof Vi gi a a t tcour t a f r e t c e t t s c r sr c t or he s e n s rc r ni nd ha t r ns e r d he as o hi ou t on O c obe 11 201 t r , 3. II. A f al court cnnnot gr a habeas petton unl t pettoner has exhaust t eder ant ii ess he ii ed he r medis a lbl i t c t oft sa e i whi h he wasco c e Pr ie v.RodrR z, e e vaia e n he ours he t t n c nvit d. e s r i ue 411U. 475( 973) ft peiine ha fie t e us saec ur rme es t fdealc t S. 1 .I he tto r s ald o xha t tt o t e di ,he e r our mus ds s t ep tto . S a o v S t 4 4 U. 5 ( 9 ) I Vigna an n d ah r w t imis h ei n lytn . mi 0 S. 3 1 71. n r ii, o - e t o i h, f on uli a e y m us pr s nther c a m s t t Supr m e Cour of V igi a a r e ve a r lng el tm t l t ee l i o he e t r ni nd ec i ui fom t tc tbeo eaf dea dititc ur may c nsde he cai . Se Va.Codej 8. r ha our fr e rl src o t o i r r l ms e 01 65 l t s c s ,i i c e rt t Haison ha ye t purue he ha ascli s i t Supr m e 4. n hi a e t s l a ha rt s to s r be am n he e Cou ofVigi a. Ac or ngl t c tfndst tHar t n ha notf l e use he sae rt r ni c di y, he our i ha iso s uly xha t d r tt co tr m edi be or flng he f de a habe s pe ii ur e es f e ii r e rl a tton. 111. Ba e o t ef rg i , h c u t imis sHart n' ha a peiin wih u p eudc s d n h o e ong t e o r d s se iso s be s t o to t rj ie t a une s xhaus e t d. E T R TiA/ aoot e21. N E : hs idyf cbr 03 o, dlie Sae DititJ d e ntd tt s src u g
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
